What is in it (in the petition).
They, the UK, would have plenty of time to ask its Parliament to consider a soft Brexit or no Brexit at all.
2. Would have time to organize and prepare its population of the pro and cons of a Brexit.
3. Would give time to its people to discuss amongst them that of the Brexit.
4. If its Parliament lead to a soft Brexit, would have time to elaborate the first internal laws of how to do that in the first months. Timed to (1) one- or (2) two-months period.
5. If its Parliament leads to a “no Brexit”, would have time to explain to its people why the gov decided so …immediately start the referendum within the (2) two years given but before the end of its 3 months, whichever date they agree for the people to issue its second wish either to override the first or change it or leave it.
6. if its Parliament leads to a second referendum, would have plenty of time to organize, instruct from the gov official directive, how, when and why the purpose of the second referendum is needed: “now that the UK people are better informed to make a choice, the people would decide after experiencing the situation of leaving or not leaving, to better decide that of the Brexit.
…if so, then the Parliament of the Lords and the parliament of the Commons and the government, presided by the Prime Minister, each one of them would elaborate the questioning to be presented to the people to make a choice.
All of the above will give to its citizens time to acclimate, understand and discuss amongst its Kingdoms (the people themselves) the pre-fabricated questions published in all their newspapers, will give time for broadcasters, this is, the news to discuss amongst the people that pro and cons of the Brexit, so that when time to make a choice comes, voters know what will be the election made of, cuz politicians would have a prescription written for the voters on the decision made to be tabulated, analyzed and clearly formulate the final choosing in yes or no and how of the Brexit.
Example:
Leave the union with Europe: Yes No.
Leave the union with Europe slowly: Yes No.
Keep UK in the single market
of the European Union: Yes No.
Brexit: undecided: Yes No.
Mind the way. Yes
Mind the way. No
…and things like the above, then their representatives, the MP, knows exactly what to do after its people issue that. All on the above to be considered and do it: “so be it” as decided by its population and goes for it!
Important, there must be a majority always of 51% or over 51% and/or re-start a third referendum again until reaching a majority of 51 or more, not under 51%. This is a second opinion to reaffirm or denies the first.
Politicians would have plenty of time to start, if needed, long before the time concession given by the EU to the UK.
Would have plenty of space to elaborate the first laws on Health, Pensions, and legal residency of non-UK people that must be elaborated immediately.
Two years and extra of 3 months would be good enough even though UK could abandon the European Union immediately if the House of Lords decides as well as the House of Commons decide too, after the second referendum of course. If no decision is taken, then the Prime Minister would have the upper hand before the last three months start in order not to get a penalty by the EU. So, two years and 3 months is sufficient enough even the Brexit could be activated within 30, 40, or 60 days not waiting for that long time.
…make it 2 years plus 3 month and leave even before if decided so.
…if the people decide to stay, no more discussions, so be it!
Words like a free nation, sovereignty, independence, and the likes, should not be included in the referendum, that is a matter of discussions by the people themselves. Question should be simple and clear after the gov decide how it is going to deal with the situation of Brexit in respect to the European Union by giving to them a clear exposition of why UK needs the most time or the whatever time politicians ask to solve the situation.
This second referendum is the solution to Brexit and the above or something like should be done; that in accordance with the spirit of the UK, would suffice the European Union to go ahead: 2 years with a penalty if reach the 3 extra months.
https://youtu.be/iAq395YHW4o
No comments:
Post a Comment