I do not know how to define my personal
status with the abuses committed about me and so on about ourselves with
others.
I don't know how
to define my personal experience and emotions, what many call spiritual, but, I feel frustrated, restless and could
say, with rage ... an internal rage that I must not let invade my body because
I do not gain anything with that, but altering my normal health ... having an aneurysm in the trunk of the
aorta, this would be deadly for me.
Seen others enjoy
or use others as if others were farmed pens' animals, these are, the others,the majorities of the people, those who give
their vows in electoral voting to choose
their masters: illiterate politicians thirsting for riches, thirst for welfare
for them and those like them, they are the super rich extremes in power over
others.
There are
different philosophies of exploitation of a people, and these philosophies are:
Dictatorships.
Communism.
Socialism.
And free
enterprise.
But there is
another situation that is not a philosophy but a mixture of all of them:
Democracy.
The few super
rich extremes exist in the first four philosophies mentioned above, they went
on the market and invaded Democracy, which was then a phenomenon of human
nature, was human spirit, nobility, equality of the thinking being, wisdom, of
begotten, unsused knowledge, experience over time since the accidental creation
of man be feminine and / or male.. The
super-rich man takes over Democracy and from there he rules, nepotism and enjoyment
of the laboriousness of others.
The four
philosophies of the Dictatorship, Communism, Socialism and free enterprise
since then are called Democratic systems which is a falsehood.
Where do the
sciences come in? Sciences are
themselves since the creation of man the order to use to improve his existence
in the universe of space and time. Within
the four philosophies departments had been created with the purpose of helping
the entire conglomerate of the people, these departments do not function to their fullness in the manner of public interest but, in the
way of the interest of its philosophy.
In Democracy, the
departments created should theoretically function as defined by their articles
of regulations. Let's mention a few of
them: The Department of Public Welfare, called in the United States, "Welfare." Most of the people who run this department
are people of very little culture,
although many of them have two to four
years of university education, but others have only taken a course of
about ten and eight months to execute actions designated to be applied to users
of the Public Welfare department. Some
of them accept give-to-detectives. I
know of a case of a person who many years
ago accepted a diamond ring valued at nine hundred dollars in exchange for
applying the toughest rules to punish another person. Investigators were also sent to investigate a
person and insisted that that person make false accusations against an
individual accused of having violated the sexual privacy of a young woman been
ten years old, her own daughter; there were
to facts to accuse the father... then the investigators insisted on convincing
her daughter's girlfriend's mother that he also annoyed her daughter of equal
age. The girl categorically denied the accusations
and said she wasn't going to say things that weren't true. Investigators wanted the mother to make the
accusation against the father who allegedly violated her daughter's sexual
rights. What sexual rights? It was not really known what the researchers
in the Public Department of Welfare were referring to. The weekly salary of these researchers ranges
from about $500 to $800. If they can't create a scapegoat to accuse
someone who might be innocent of the accusation, then they would lose
brilliance in their investigative roles.
Remember that those same researchers when they were young elementary,
middle and high schools ... were young people looking for lawsuits or "bullies
(bullies)) as it sounds in the English language. Others took a ten-month and eight-month
course because they did not attend any university teachings for good
preparation and, in addition, they were smokers in a few
portions of drugs but managed to
overcome and it is not known how with the devil they came to work as social
investigators, police, inspectors and other
grasses of the public service of the departments designed to serve the people …these
people abound in all philosophical systems designated to govern.
In non-Democratic
countries, these departments serve more in the service of the government than
the local community.
Note, everything
written will be edited later. The above
are real cases. These are events that,
in my view, form a cancer in the social fabric.
It should be known that, in very few countries, with considerable
progress in teaching, with very advanced practices of the prison system and
mode of courts, these cancers in the social fabric are not very abundant,
although in the four philosophical systems mentioned above they exist in their
fullness.
In Democracy,
this social cancer exists because
Democracy is partly understood by these four philosophies, poorly drafted and
completely controlled by the super rich extremes who are taking Democracy to
its lowest point and therefore, giving a
weak purpose to one of man's richest systems: Freedom, Democracy and Free
Expression with regard to the right of others.
How I conclude
the case above expressed
What decisions
I've made
Let it happen.
