...A.I as proof on action in a court.

...the truth is, after immersed deeper and deeper into the understanding, I mean, into listening what Artificial Inteligent is, now, am getting scared a litter bit more than before. A.I could be used to proof an inocent human after been killed to be guilty with the intention of committing a crime the human never tried but, "her voice" proof been done by the accused person in self-defense; and set free. A sentence to jail for the rest of their life the persons supposely involved in the killing proof the contrary. Do not undestand me? "A woman lies dead on the floor, another claims the dead one attacked him and his wife, they in self-defense could take the weapon off her hand and kill the person with the weapon instead. A recordered voice video and image shows the act. A judge set free the suspects and life continue as if nothing happened but, this is the real case: "a couple of people invited a friend to visit them, no body knew of that "friend" but the couple; they stole a large amount of money (cash) to the dead woman and killed her as recorded by the A.I camera shown in court. Got it?

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/29/technology/openai-voice-engine.html?ugrp=c&unlocked_article_code=1.gU0.bzJy.f8Eh4mhfprLI&smid=url-share https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/29/technology/openai-voice-engine.html?ugrp=c&unlocked_article_code=1.gU0.bzJy.f8Eh4mhfprLI&smid=url-share