Why slave holders fought for the freedom of the black skin people, yet they kept their slaves.

Why slave holders fought for the freedom of the black skin people, yet they kept their slaves.

…always wanted to discuss slavery, but slavery in this nation, not slavery around the world on the suffering of the black colours humans cuz been of black skin.

Yes, there been many of the so-called whites that defended blacks, yet they were slave holders -and that is the basis of this short argument here.

…on that time of slave holders and the freedom given back to slave Americans, there is one thing that historians ignore which I am going not to ignore here and why many blacks decided to stay with there former “masters”.  This carries some ironies cuz many history writers do not write using and/understanding the “why” of things, the “why” of existence, the “why” of nature and the “why” of slavery.

The why of slavery.

To own slaves, in the United States of America, first thing: must be white, rich and have influence in the community.

If you had not these niches, all and still more, the person could not own slaves.

Most slaves’ owners were “landlord”; to cultivate the land, the landowner had to employ lot of people.  Buying people was the rule of thumbs.  It is a logic of common sense that if any landlords could go to the market and purchase a person, the landlord is not going to hire any white person to do heavy labor.  Aside that, white people would not work or do heavy work to any landlord for a misery of pay.  The logic was “buy a human” and solution made.

Humans could be purchased since long ago, be them white or not and that was a part of practice that ended in the most grotesque killing amongst different territories and kingdoms …and the poor of that time enlisted into self-created warriors by landlords in order to conquer other lands and turn richest after the war.  Peasant workers that lived in landlords’ particular farms, volunteer to fight with the landlords so that the conquered territories not only were shared amongst landlords but too, amongst their soldiers that might later turn into landlords.  Many soldiers turned into warriors (todays combatants) and that were their carrier.  There are abundant stories of warriors that became celebrities on that time at their own space.  Kings were the most influential landlords going down to the chain to generals, senators, governants and priests mostly Catholics such as popes that were, some of them, landlords very rich, using the belief to enrich themselves and even commanding kings.  That was the business of that time.

After too many people abandoned Europe, the social system used in that continent was brought onto the new lands.

…to be continue

Slavery was one of them.

Poor people sold their families when they could not pay a personal one to one loan, they sent their daughters, sons or any person closed to the family, to work for certain time: one, two, three years or more until the time agreed elapse or the debtor pays the loan.  The person was a slave to whom the debt had to be paid ...the person had to do whatsoever was told to do, no matter what.

That custom was imported to the new lands, what today is known as America.

Cuz those immigrants became landowners, with vast lots to cultivate, the best candidate for that was to go to the old continents and steal people from other lands as kingdoms used to do by fighting other lands, killing most of all its inhabitants and keep the young women as their own and used them for sex, work on their homes doing errands and the likes.  Whites enslaving Whites.

...but for this new land, they needed slaves to do heavy, very heavy errands ...they went back to the old world and did what in the black continent used to be done: conquering their neighbours and enslaving them the same as White did with Whites.

Here, in the called: Americas, it was worst ...blacks were not considered humans but a kind of animal human-like of a thing and explained as such in philosophical works as one of them explained it: carries no soul, has no soul ...so were pure and simple: "animals" as a dog, a cow or any other beast.

These animals could be exploited to its maximum.  Aristotle's philosophical work used this meaning to defend and legalize "Blacks" as animals.

...they were raped, beaten, work long hours without rest, give them no mercy, sell them as you sell a pig and so on, blah, blah, blah of the likes.

When given freedom via a constitutional law, still, slavery was enforced.  Many slaves did not feel secure if leaving the place where the lived and were forced, due to the situation, in remaining with their masters.  Many politicians, though agreed of the emancipation of the black people, decided to keep those "slaves" with them, in their lots, cuz if sent out, other people would "steal" them and even sell them to other landlords that needed a lot of slaves to work in plantations and other farms.
...based on some historical analyses been done on that in order to write here it concluded the there was some natural symbiotic relationship on those "slaves" that stayed living in the land of their landlords than going free to open land; they and their landlords concluded that it would be better in staying together as it is now known: a win win situation.  Blacks that stayed with that type of landowners, this is, landlords, felt secure instead of advancing into open land and be captured to be sold in the south.
...many ill informed writers, commentators and other grasses are postulating that slaves preferred been slaves than free people.
...why of that?  Be reading the acts of those few and past politicians that "kept" their slaves yet wrote in the USA  Magna Carta : "all men are created equal" ...and "kept their slaves.  It is an irony, yes it is but, if those slaves of those freedom lovers of history, move away from them, they would be hunted like beast and sold to the south of USA.
Remember, from the South of US, there were people that came to the North of US to hunt for Black people, taking them to the South and reselling them.
Got the point? If not, this can not be pressed into the conscience and or ill mentality of those writers.  

...it was like a revolution of conscience that started a real revolution, not a civilian one as history tells, but a revolution from improvised armies and existing armies against the government ...and the stories continues until as of today that some white descendants of the past, want to bring back the Aristotle's theory that blacks have no soul, therefore, are pure and simple: animals.

...this mentalities are a product of the high ignorant in existence of the past.

Some people, whites, that in one way or the other, are very poor in thinking, adhere to the past.  Yet they look to be smart intelligent people, they are more of an animal than human.  And they are politicians.