Observe here that not only many police hate the black colour
skin people, some blacks too.
If the observer here, observes closely, would notice how the
former police officer on the right put a false statement on the situation:
David Thomas said: “that choice of using discretion, what actually happens in
that process is, if I let him go, there’s nothing to keep him from returning to
that vehicle and driving it. And he is impaired. So, because of that, the
police do nothing, and if he kills somebody, then the police are going to be
held liable for that. So, it is a double-edged sword.”
…observe that Mr. David Thomas is, and clearly is,
indirectly, justifying the killing of Rayshard Brooks in Atlanta, based on
supposition …Houston, we have a problem.
First what David Thomas supposes, is not a fact that can be attributed
to how Rayshard Brooks is going to react, do or had done. Attribution of
happenings to a person that had not done such a “happening”, is a clear show of
prejudice. “if you are black, you are a
mean person”, and the said by me here is pure prejudice.
So, Mr. David Thomas here has prejudice against black people
been he himself, BLACK.
...ad-on: if some one who could be drunk, sits inside of a car, parked, engine off: a police have the legal justified right to kill him?
...if someone is drunk, it is illegal to rest or sleep by the driver seat?
...am confused.
...it seems that the person, if black, could be killed ...no?
No comments:
Post a Comment