My apologies
to France: what’s wrong with Macron?
French President Emmanuel Macron, right, poses for a photo with a
reenactor soldiers during a ceremony as part of the celebrations of the
centenary of the First World War - Philippe Wojazer/Reuters Pool© Philippe Wojazer/Reuters Pool
He looks to
be Trump-like mentality. Is it that Macron has become a member of the “absolute
idiots?” Or is it that he always been that? Does he know the meaning of: “UNITE
AND WINS, DIVIDE AND LOSE”. CAN FRANCE APORT BILLIONS OF DOLLARS EACH AND EVERY
YEAR AS NEEDED TO PROTECT EUROPE? CAN FRANCE, AS OF NOW, UNDER THE LEADERSHIP
OF MACRON, GUARANTEE A PENSION OR RETIREMENT INCREASE TO ITS CITIZENS THAT ARE
DEMANDING NOT TO TOUCH THE LIVING HOOD OF THEIR FUTURE AS THE FRUIT OF THEIR
SOCIAL SACRIFICE MADE WORKING YEARS AND YEARS AND THEN DELAY THAT FUTURE A
COUPLE OF YEARSS AFTER WORKING SO HARD ALL THEIR LIVES AND IN THE FINAL EPOCH
OF TRHEIR LIVES …STILL WAIT LONGER? France shall not succumb after it went through
a hard and dangerous history just because a man, a sole man. After other
nations went to help their brother nation: FRANCE! …get liberated from a
terrorist of he second War World that almost would have eradicate this
beautiful country. Viva Francia!
France is a
real great nation, its language, its food, its people, and the root of HUMAN
RIGHTS declaration, a universal AXION, appendix of the human existence, the
adjective of Democracy. And now this…
See a
portion of an analysis, Mr. Tim Collins wrote in “The Telegraph” and all of it
in the link below after.
“That’s odd, because the EU – as
distinct from Nato – has theoretically had a variety of different
rapid-response forces for decades, way back to the European Rapid Operational
Force announced in 1995 (and disbanded in 2012). The latest foolish plan along
these lines is French President Macron’s call last month for a European army
able to act independently of the US and Nato, including a 5,000-strong “rapid
response force”.
In fairness to Macron, he was
the one who called the warring Sudanese generals and brokered a ceasefire of
sorts, which has helped a lot with the initial rescue efforts. He was pushing
on an open door as it was in the interests of both sides for foreigners to
leave unscathed, but it was nonetheless a minor diplomatic win for Macron.
Macron, of course, needs every
win he can get given the fact that France is basically in a state of
insurrection now. The other lever that French presidents traditionally reach
for in times of domestic crisis is bashing the US or Nato. Macron’s recent
calls for an EU rapid response force could be dismissed as a swipe at Nato,
except that he is apparently serious about trying to develop some kind of
EU-only military capability.
It’s not the most foolish insult
to Nato and the USA that a French president has ever offered – that would
probably be the “get out and stay out” call by Charles De Gaulle in 1966 – but
it is intensely rude and unhelpful in these tense times. Macron’s apologists
would doubtless point to the Aukus pact and
argue that the UK and US are drifting away from the defence of Europe; but
Aukus is exactly the opposite of that. It is a focus on the real emerging
threat: China.
We must remember that Nato was
formed in 1947, the same year that the US Joint Chiefs of Staff stood up to
address the new threats of a Cold War world. Today there is talk of creating a
civilian equivalent of the Joint Chiefs to manage US civilian departments
effectively and efficiently against the burgeoning Chinese menace. France could
learn from this sort of thinking”
Continue here:
No comments:
Post a Comment