Logic versus reasoning.

Logic versus reasoning.


…in the Mueller’s Russia’s interfering in USA elections.

1.   The study of principles of reasoning, especially of the structure of propositions as distinguished from their content, and of method and validity in deductive reasoning.

…seen here it is the part of the whole, not the whole.

…it is too, at the same time: the manner of its intent.

…well, it is, logic, a set of rules precisely organized to bring the desired result or results.  Logic has no association with any rule on mathematics in which 5 times 4 is equal 20 or 4 times 5 is equal 20.

Here, logic is a number with self-value, so logic is X number …for X is any number.

Now, times, here is its reasoning, and reasoning could have different inferences such as dividing, subtracting, multiplication and or adding whether in fraction or infinitive of fractions of its reasoning represented in (./.), (-), (x), (+) and these are its essences.

As seem above, in logic, by just changing its essence, not its values, the whole result changes to a different conclusion, this is, 5 divided by 4 is equal to 1.25, this is, one whole of a unit and one quarter of another whole.  Just change one of its essences, not any of its values and the result is entirely different. In 5 times 4 it is 20 or 4 times 5 still 20 but, if one of its essence not its values is changed, this is from “times” into “division”, the entire result are different as was before.

…by this it means: 4 x 5 is exactly equal as 5 x 4 which value is 20 but if 4 ./. 5 = 0.8 is not the same than 5 ./. 4 = 1.25

The above means two different logics could be use and its value is not change but if essence is changed, the result of its value is changed.

On the above “Logic” had been used.  But in below, reasoning had been used …on which logic is an x number, an objective number and reasoning is its essence, a subject of the numbers  involve, this is, its essence.



Now known the versus of “Logic” and “reasoning”  Permits to proceed in reasoning different results in its conclusion.

By manipulation of the essences of the values, its numbers, different results can be achieved.

In “Mueller testifies in front of the House Judiciary Committee”

“Peter struck testified before this committee on July twelfth two thousand eighteen that he was fired because you were concerned about preserving the appearance of independence you read this testimony.

https://youtu.be/MiIgTGjHTUQ?t=11393 at 3:09:58 to be exact, now move to: 3:10:52 and see here “Logic versus reasoning: as stated above.

Say that again if you could.  That he said he was fired at least partially because you were you were worried about a concerned about preserving the appearance of independence with the special counsel’s investigation…

…here the essence was “worried about a concerned”

…but it could be: “worried about a concerned” it would affect the president-elected involvement with a foreign state …feel that the essence is the fact that Russia interfered in US November 2016 internal national elections to pick up a President, commander in Chief of the armed forces of the Nation State been that USA, and chief of the whole nation.  As above clearly said:

2.    The study of principles of reasoning, especially of the structure of propositions as distinguished from their content, and of method and validity in deductive reasoning.

3.   The study of principles of reasoning is its essence.

4.   The structures of propositions, are its content.

5.   …and the method is using an essence of secretive alliances via private unofficial meetings with foreign nationals.

6.   And final, the validity used here is its essences.

7.   …ending in deductive reasoning as which gave origin for a candidate to the Presidency of USA been elected into that position.