Not a “senseless comment,” it is a critique of a careless site which has made billions of dollars at expense of others be them politicians or simple people.
When
I read in the news this: {Pelosi
added to this rhetoric, saying, “Unwarranted, concentrated economic power in
the hands of a few is dangerous to democracy — especially when digital
platforms control content.
"The era of self-regulation is
over.”}, I felt elated, why? Public institutions, some, are using the public in
such a way that their acts cause public surprise “seen, listening and
discovering” that a high class politician, a scientist or even an enemy to the
public is presented not as such, but as a violator of his own believes. In the case of an enemy to the public it means
taking any word said and enclosing that word tied to a message not meant by
that enemy to the public just to cause sensation on the reader. That a scientist discovery sometimes is
attached to animal or human abuse in order to gain knowledge and that a
politician exposing his/her view on a theme, is distorted (on purpose) by the
institution presenting his/her views.
This one case of a “careless site
which has made billions of dollars at the expense of others is a public international
site the care not on respecting any politician but money, the more the better …okay,
it happened that the person whom Facebook’s owner distorted her image was of a
very well admired, respected and high class of the system of freedom in US, Nancy
Pelosi.
Not only this politician had been used
in Facebook as a jewel to make and give the wrong impression just to attract
the attention of viewers but Facebook rely on given false and fabricated
information on whoever and still presenting that whoever as been a monster to
society, while Facebook gets more and much more audience so the site, maliciously,
make billion of dollars with fabricated “facts” of which the affected one cannot
answer back, luckily, Facebook grabbed the wrong iron, a hot iron that should,
I think, burn the owner hands and affect on way or the other many more internet
site that are not at guilt as Facebook is: guilty of spreading “fabricated
proof”
One thing it is when any internet
site makes a very negative or positive comment of a politician and the site
does not distort the politician words or enclose a specific phrase or sentence
by adding fabricated (by the site) words to the politician explanation of a
situation, and other thing is when professionally, a site looks for facts, not
tainted videos and real investigation of a politician discourse, life and
history and publish that world wide …and profit of that by selling add space to
buyers to make their business propaganda as onlookers read on their publishing
data as well as the site respect and follow the law not only of its residential
location but, follows some form of caution as not to cause harm on things not proved
to the affected one. No site has the
right in saying such and such politician is an indecent politician cuz he/she
used the word f…you; should the site know that is a word already legalized by
the people, mostly here in USA. Of
course, the f…word is decent to say, what is not decent to say is the complete
total word yet sometimes is acceptable to with exception when publishing in a
site just for minors. In the adult world
it has a specific meaning in social turns.
Be it known that Facebook is abusing,
abusing and abusing in all its semantic the right to critic others like
covering your face and shooting into a large group of people in a meeting with
the purpose to hurt someone you want to hurt but shooting to the mass.
…yes, distinguished politician Facebook
shall be penalized in one way or the other, Europe just did that with some
billions (?) of dollars or might be millions (?) with a warning attached to
it. But do not hurt others, other sites
that has nothing to do with the ERRATIC CONDUCT OF FACEBOOK.
No comments:
Post a Comment