Why slave holders fought for the
freedom of the black skin people, yet they kept their slaves.
…always wanted to discuss slavery,
but slavery in this nation, not slavery around the world on the suffering of
the black colours humans cuz been of black skin.
Yes, there
been many of the so-called whites that defended blacks, yet they were slave
holders -and that is the basis of this short argument here.
…on that
time of slave holders and the freedom given back to slave Americans, there is
one thing that historians ignore which I am going not to ignore here and why
many blacks decided to stay with there former “masters”. This carries some ironies cuz many history
writers do not write using and/understanding the “why” of things, the “why” of
existence, the “why” of nature and the “why” of slavery.
The why of
slavery.
To own
slaves, in the United States of America, first thing: must be white, rich and
have influence in the community.
If you had
not these niches, all and still more, the person could not own slaves.
Most slaves’
owners were “landlord”; to cultivate the land, the landowner had to employ lot
of people. Buying people was the rule of
thumbs. It is a logic of common sense
that if any landlords could go to the market and purchase a person, the landlord
is not going to hire any white person to do heavy labor. Aside that, white people would not work or do
heavy work to any landlord for a misery of pay.
The logic was “buy a human” and solution made.
Humans could
be purchased since long ago, be them white or not and that was a part of
practice that ended in the most grotesque killing amongst different territories
and kingdoms …and the poor of that time enlisted into self-created warriors by
landlords in order to conquer other lands and turn richest after the war. Peasant workers that lived in landlords’
particular farms, volunteer to fight with the landlords so that the conquered
territories not only were shared amongst landlords but too, amongst their
soldiers that might later turn into landlords.
Many soldiers turned into warriors (todays combatants) and that were
their carrier. There are abundant
stories of warriors that became celebrities on that time at their own
space. Kings were the most influential
landlords going down to the chain to generals, senators, governants and priests
mostly Catholics such as popes that were, some of them, landlords very rich,
using the belief to enrich themselves and even commanding kings. That was the business of that time.
After too
many people abandoned Europe, the social system used in that continent was
brought onto the new lands.
…to be
continue
Slavery was one of them.
Poor people sold their families when they could not pay a personal
one to one loan, they sent their daughters, sons or any person closed to the
family, to work for certain time: one, two, three years or more until the time
agreed elapse or the debtor pays the loan. The person was a slave to whom the debt had to be paid ...the person had to do whatsoever was told to do,
no matter what.
That custom was imported to the new lands, what today is known as
America.
Cuz those immigrants became landowners, with vast lots to
cultivate, the best candidate for that was to go to the old continents and
steal people from other lands as kingdoms used to do by fighting other lands,
killing most of all its inhabitants and keep the young women as their own and
used them for sex, work on their homes doing errands and the likes.
Whites enslaving Whites.
...but for this new land, they
needed slaves to do heavy, very heavy errands ...they went back to the old
world and did what in the black continent used to be done: conquering their
neighbours and enslaving them the same as White did with Whites.
Here, in the called: Americas,
it was worst ...blacks were not considered humans but a kind of animal
human-like of a thing and explained as such in philosophical works as one of
them explained it: carries no soul, has no soul ...so were pure and simple:
"animals" as a dog, a cow or any other beast.
These animals could be
exploited to its maximum. Aristotle's philosophical work used this meaning to
defend and legalize "Blacks" as animals.
...they were raped, beaten,
work long hours without rest, give them no mercy, sell them as you sell a pig
and so on, blah, blah, blah of the likes.
When given freedom via a
constitutional law, still, slavery was enforced. Many slaves did not feel
secure if leaving the place where the lived and were forced, due to the
situation, in remaining with their masters. Many politicians, though
agreed of the emancipation of the black people, decided to keep those
"slaves" with them, in their lots, cuz if sent out, other people
would "steal" them and even sell them to other landlords that needed
a lot of slaves to work in plantations and other farms.
...based on some historical analyses been done on that in order to write here it concluded the there was some natural symbiotic relationship on those "slaves" that stayed living in the land of their landlords than going free to open land; they and their landlords concluded that it would be better in staying together as it is now known: a win win situation. Blacks that stayed with that type of landowners, this is, landlords, felt secure instead of advancing into open land and be captured to be sold in the south.
...many ill informed writers, commentators and other grasses are postulating that slaves preferred been slaves than free people.
...why of that? Be reading the acts of those few and past politicians that "kept" their slaves yet wrote in the USA Magna Carta : "all men are created equal" ...and "kept their slaves. It is an irony, yes it is but, if those slaves of those freedom lovers of history, move away from them, they would be hunted like beast and sold to the south of USA.
Remember, from the South of US, there were people that came to the North of US to hunt for Black people, taking them to the South and reselling them.
Got the point? If not, this can not be pressed into the conscience and or ill mentality of those writers.
...it was like a revolution of
conscience that started a real revolution, not a civilian one as history tells,
but a revolution from improvised armies and existing armies against the
government ...and the stories continues until as of today that some white descendants of the past, want to bring back the Aristotle's theory that blacks
have no soul, therefore, are pure and simple: animals.
...this mentalities are a
product of the high ignorant in existence of the past.
Some people, whites, that in
one way or the other, are very poor in thinking, adhere to the past. Yet
they look to be smart intelligent people, they are more of an animal than
human. And they are politicians.
