...the
wrong trade wars.
The issue: US vs. China
US had shown a trade deficit with
China since long, this had caused that our President made his own argument why
that been happening since a couple of decades ago.
In order to find the root of the
cause why US has a deficit in trade income balance than China it has to be
known, and Trump is correct, that it is USA fault, not China. Trade is
the interchange of valued products with another business, not the number of
products involved. This causes a second problem: when the product's
valued is controlled, manipulated or withhold, this is, putting hardships in
its production due to human cause (not environmental causes), the recipients of
the benefit originated from the products, one of them turns into a loser while
the other or various of them in a winner but if the value of the product is set
to be filtered on "production and demand", no one loses, everyone is
a winner. Why? Those involved in the production and sale of the
product either shift to a different creation of other products or invent or
design new tech to increase its production and still get a benefit at the long
run. And that is called competition, new devices are created just
born from the need in making money. It is especially important to mention
an intermediary, here in USA called: Wall Street. Wall street is more or
less a referee, one who then tells who a winner is and who is a looser.
And that, in US, is set on the standards of the free market.
...but for the above, and this is a
big but, when someone takes over the control that naturally is inherited by the
free market, both producers and buyers turn into losers, no winners and it
originates what now we call: "trade war".
People demand gives origin to new
techs, values, abundance and the likes of likes ...and that is why in societies
controlled in all its time and space by totalitarianism, totalitarian govs,
this is, Socialism and/or Communism, they turn into failers, people that are
unsuccessful.
Societies had given rise to strange
form of govs, which uses totalitarianism and Capitalism in there practice of
Socialism, this, ultimately will end up in a system of Democracy, it is,
unconsciously, a group of people thinking on behalf of millions of people and
deciding what best for them, creating, and they are forced to do, a totally
military gov, not a Democratic gov. It will end in the long run, into a
Democracy or it will turn into failers ...and Democracy will take over, like it
or not.
...it was the same of the evolution
of Democracy: from feudal into Democratic States.
...if a person acts, voluntarily,
controlling the free markets on production and demands, the society involved
shall take an abysm deep down to the end of the slope and crack down as it falls
to the edge of the slope, its end.
To compete against a
Capitalist-Social Nation State, decision-making cannot be imposed by cracking
the free market and imposing conditions that might or might not end in
succeeding in its objective but helping the Capitalist-Social Nation State; it backfires
"Free Enterprise."
...to transit from any form of gov into a Democracy it
takes a long time, that happens to today Democracy
inherited from Sparta and Athena long
ago in social history.
...on the above, that is why "group work" is an important "entity" of Democracy.
