Sunday, July 09, 2023

 

Data extracted from the New York Times.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/09/business/janet-yellen-china-us.html

Opinion based on observations on things going on around the world by Freedomsdmocracy1st.

China is hurt, economically, morally, and militarily.

Economically:

The USA and many other countries (Democratic ones), have retired too many businesses and placed them in other countries (Laos, Cambodia, India, etc., etc., etc.)  that had cause tremendous capital disequilibrium in the Chinese social fabric and therefore had affected its government movement paying teachers, elders’ pensions, and infrastructure maintenance and new creations. Authority in China is controlled directly from its central government even though decisions seem to be taken by its authorities, but they reflect the state of emotion of its president, dictator Xi Jinping who has the last word. Now this: in reality, Chinese authorities do not want to contradict China’s dictator Xi and therefore take decisions that would please this man emotions which is fully based on spirit of Mao Tse-tung, not on the waves of the world economy. This is the 21.st Century, Mao existed in the past century and the tech of that epoch does not adapt to this tech of this century cuz it, if compared, is old, obsolete, and wrong. Communism had ever any success but the abuse of it owns, sacrifice of its own and a delirium of progress using forced labor and dictated social orders that goes in deterioration of its people so, false propaganda is used to let its people knows that Communism is the salvation of all humans. Business is business, not a system dictated by any government. The things where government can intervene in businesses is creating laws to collect taxes, creating laws to protect workers, creating laws to protect businesses themselves and distributing the taxes collected to support its social fabric in accordance with the need that arises, not telling businesses how to do business cuz governments do not own them, its people who owns them.  This 21st century had created a social fabric that interlace with other geosocial fabric in order to increase productivity and create things, upgrading things in order for humans to survive; its population cannot survive without advancing tech. Xi Jinping, a man and with a communist methodology, is telling one and a halve billion people how to do things based on a social theory of Marxism, not the social theory and manpower of each and every individual in that social fabric.  Here why: in the case of the USA and other countries, the labour of the workforce in China, would ease both countries in a “Win-Win strategy. USA had been forced to abandon China doing business cuz they, its government created a total abusive law at which any so call private sector in China, must share business secret with the Chinese gov. Authorities in China have a base of corruption (stealing and selling the private effort that foreign business creates, selling the so called “copyright” to other business that are indirectly or directly connected to the Chinese Communist Party, that then use those copyright against the countries of which those business proceeded just to physically destroy those or that country.  That said here is an irony: “I feed you for you to come to my home and assault me and my family?” Fact: the CCP wants to invade Taiwan and has not done so yet, cuz USA opposes it.  What would happen then if they invaded Taiwan? They will stop exporting HIGH GRADE CONPUTER CHIPS to be used for USA and any other Democratic entity for submarines, airplanes, and warplanes, for high designed computers of any type of kind, for advance industries such as building machineries for agriculture, cars, medical equipment and so on, so on …oh! Unless the USA and all other countries adapt the Car Max theory of Communism by becoming a Marxist geopolitical state. This is, “be as I said, not as you wish.”

Democracy in a democratic region was born rooted in the principle of philosophy that jumped into the principle of commerce from feudalism to what is today. That Democracy has many problems? Yes, that is true but the people that take part in that Democracy, all, find solutions for that. Not using dictamen from one person, just one or a few not associated at all with the people business.

On thieves.

Humans have natural self-independence behaviour, which is stealing, enriching from the effort of others.  It does not matter about the system. In a Democracy, people try and use sense, logic, reasoning, and control its society by investing in morals in order for that society to have compassion to the rest that could not succeed to have at least, a comfortable state of been. Communism has no compassion. Things belong to the GOVERNMENT, NOT TO PEOPLE.

Democracy had to create laws to control those businesses doing work in China which politicians have the intention of killing Democracy by forcing a system that is a total failure to humans.

…see now why I say that “Politics is part philosophy, part not” and that capitalism is the grease that lubricate the structure of Free Enterprise. YET EXTREME CAPITALISM IS A CANCER FOR DEMOCRACY, business rule themselves, the government does not rule them but watch them do not abuse the geopopulation or pay a price with money or jail or both.

USA still does not consider the Chinese people its enemy but a party to compete in businesses.


No comments: