I totally disagree with Elon Mask propaganda.

 I totally disagree with Elon Musk propaganda, yet he is a great person that in the future his today's work will be fructiferous, but, as of now, it is just pure and complex propaganda with that of the Electric Vehicle, here why:

The fed is working hard making new laws, giving grants, offering tax discount and things like that.

Elon Musk registered a name of a Scientist, as his car brand name, which is illegal cuz that's a common name that anyone could use too. It is not Elon's property (a cheater?).

...he gives the impression that he invented it even though he did improve it using today's existing technologies and the people who worked on it, his hired mechanical and electrical engineers, created ...they have no merit on their work but Mask.

It is an illusion that E V is a very good people saver for advance technology cuz it helps to fight atmospheric pollution (totally false, you will see why).

For a person to possess an E V he/she must have a charger available, there is none unless the driver travel few miles far to find one, then charge paying small cost per full charge that if in the city of New York or any large city, a cosmopolitan city, would take almost a maximum of half a day just to reach the charger unit.

…if the user has a private house, they need a special batt that cost thousands of dollars+ maintenance. Might be too, solar panels costing thousands+ too.

For building dwellers, they must travel far to get an energy charge.

...and half a day returning back. Doing that, the car user spends electricity from his/her car that will be count against the one left once the user park his/her car.

People living in dwelling buildings, cannot possess an E V cuz there is no way to charge it cuz all the above said, affect them.

...this and many other inconveniences follow but the worst of them, see below.

E V is to save energy by not consuming gasoline or gasoil, and not polluting, no? Wrong!

The electricity flashed into your E V or loaded into it or charged into an e v battery, where from, do you think is generated?

...it is generated from the central energy distributor, in the case of NY: Con Edison.

Now, where from do you think Con Edison gets energy? From gasoline or gasoil burned by Con Edison!

Wow! E V owners and the gov itself, think that zero pulutan cars will be achieved soon, some time in a truly short future.

All what people are doing is not polluting directly from their E Vs and polluting indirectly from big energy producers, so, deceiving the purpose of Zero Pulutan in the year X!

Worst than that, nuclear energy producers are facing out, been eliminated, no more in used as time pass by, finish! finish, finish.

But if a gas car, just go around the corner, fill up the tank, if a 2016 up (2023) and modest beautiful vehicle, you can get 41+ miles/gallon highway; 19-27 miles/gallon city. I get 47-55+ miles/gallon in my 2022 Tucson and 21-27+ city with exception if have to make long stops on the highway or on city local streets, the cost: 380 miles/full tank on a 15-gallon tank, the cost? 45-50 dollars. Time spent doing that. Going around the corner and back in 30 minutes including parking (parking if lucky to find a parking space. The same thing if using an E V). Eventually, after 10yrs, in an E V, pay 10,000 or more dollars to install a new batt. In a mechanical modern car, spend nothing cuz the motor, transmission+ other parts have a cost depending on the manner the driver drives. Saving in an E V after 10yrs, zero, saving in a modern mechanical car? Zero. What the hell is the difference? Oh! Just forgot! In a Mechanical modern gas car: peace of mind. In an E.V: ten years of hesitant/day going to fill the batt with energy.

I have ideas of solving the problem on energy for EVs and even parking, but no one would listen to me, nor a bank would lend me few million dollars just to start, let alone the fed. Yet I have the solution.