Why Russians should abandon America, as well
as Chinese or else.
Should the US get out of Latin America?
US should not, for they and US are the same
though with different development, US
are not Russians but Europeans, Indians American turned to be a mixture of
Europeans and Indians been Indians native and Europeans the invaders but
Russians or Chinese.
...Porfirio Diaz never
fought USA, his presidency was called: Porfirian era: Porfirian era (1876–1911)
French-styled architecture in Benito Juárez, Mexico City, whose architectural
legacy remains in the neighborhoods of Condesa, Zona Rosa, Centro Historico and
Chapultepec. The gilded central foyer of the Palacio Postal, now used as the
primary post office of central Mexico City. Events such as the Mexican–American
War, the French Intervention and the Reform War left the city relatively
untouched and it continued to grow, especially during the rule of President
Porfirio Díaz. During this time, the city developed a modern infrastructure,
such as roads, schools, transportation systems and communication systems. However,
the regime concentrated resources and wealth into the city while the "rest
of the country languished in poverty." ...man, you have to learn to
interpret whatever you read, cuz something wrong either with your vision or
your mind. ...did you read: "the French intervention" and... above?
Can you read Spanish or just mumble it? Can you interpret historical accounts?
Can you relate a historical account, and other historical account the way it
is. ...man, I would not see you as my chancellor nor as my advisor cuz you
can't understand whatever you read. You have poor understanding of what you
read. ...your mind is too close. Poor intelligent to interpret even in your own
language as if you did not reach any grade in High School.
By the year 1800 and thereafter, nations invaded
other nations due to socio-economic needs and land expansion.
Not only USA invaded nearby territories, but
nearby territories invaded other lands.
In the case of Mexico, after it got its
independence from Spain, it had to
confront France itself, at war. Mexico
on that time was a disorganized territory in respect to its Northern side with
the USA. Spain had on hold the Comanche
and Apache tribes. They, the original
inhabitants of that section, felt invaded by Spain who founded Mexico. In other words, the Mexican-Spanish were
foreigners taking the Indian lands, and that was why Indians attacked all
foreigners on the lands they use to have as a subsistence for hunting. That cause the Indians to attack what was on
that time: Mexico, after its independence from Spain. The new government of Mexico could not
control nor had the resources to organize that region as did Spain. The newly born government did not take proper
care of that undefined demarcation next to USA which was well organized and ruling
the Northern part of North America. Borders
were not well demarked. USA was fighting
Indians territories and suggesting Indians land into its control. Cuz Northern Mexico and Southern USA, were inhabited
by Indians that used that land for hunting wild animals, USA decided to annex it
to its territory. Mexican themselves
could not control the Indians such as the Comanche and others, but the land was
mostly dwelled by Indians rather than the newly created Mexico. USA proceeded to conquer that land while
Mexico came in to protect that land for them.
That land was, really, a buffer zone controlled by Indians that were
fighting both: Mexicans and Americans yet Spain proclaimed that land as theirs.
USA succeeded in acquiring the land, Mexico and
the Indians lost it. Mexicans Indians became
Americans and the story depart from there on.
So, historically, Mexico lost the land to USA, yet Mexico could not rule
it or control it. The Indians did.
The above on its history is overly complex. It was not that US invaded Mexico itself but,
as Mexico confronted USA, the Indian’s land invaders, Mexico lost the land that
belong to the Indians that use it for
hunting, a land of subsistence. In reality,
USA grabbed the Indian land before Mexico could govern it. Mexico was an invader too of the Indian land.
Each and everyone wanted a piece of the cake and USA won against the Indians
and Mexico. Some Indians stayed on the
side of Mexico and others on the side of USA and change their languages from
native Indians to Spanish in the South and English in the North (the south of
USA).
Be it known that both nations were fighting
against Indians to conquer its territories, what is today Mexico, fought with the inquisition by killing
thousands of Indians and USA fought with its army killing thousands of Indians too
and taking its territories and defining a new frontier. Remember, the Spanish
were first than the newly formed North America …and Mexico real name is North
America too but with the Mexican Indians in it.
Really, it is a mess organized later as these
nations organized themselves.
Now, Mexico tells straight and clear that USA
invaded them but it was Indian territory not well defined by the invaders
Spanish conquerors that gave origin to the Mexican State but totally abandon
Indians establishments within, still abandon, neglected of hospitals, schools,
roads and drinking healthy water as well as modern way of communication. On the North American side, all that need had
been met. Indians feel to be member of US, not enemies and US see them as equal
citizens, not second class.
Mexican gov still discriminate them, the work as
servants in big cities… many Indians had landed further south of the actual
Americas and are Bolivians, Peruans and many others with specific languages, Indian
languages. The root of the original
Indians, in South American, just were eliminated, disappeared: the Mayan, the
Inca and the Tainos. Tainos still exists in Argentina and Venezuela yet those
government ignore them in its totality as they disappear by mixing amongst the
population: as if it were a “dead specie.”
They still exist in USA as a well-developed group. In reality, USA did not invade Mexico, but Indian
territory still in full bloom.
The 1832 boundaries of Comanchero, the Comanche homeland
See also: Comanche-Mexico Wars
and Apache-Mexico Wars
Mexico's
military and diplomatic capabilities declined after it attained independence
from Spain in 1821 and left the northern one-half of the country vulnerable to
the Comanche, Apache, and Navajo native Americans. The Comanche, in
particular, took advantage of the Mexican state to undertake large-scale raids
hundreds of miles into the country to acquire livestock for their own use and
to supply an expanding market in Texas and the U.S.[12]
The
northern area of Mexico was sparsely settled and not well controlled
politically by the government based in Mexico City. After independence,
Mexico contended with internal struggles that sometimes verged on civil war and
the northern frontier was not a high priority. In northern Mexico, the end of
Spanish rule was marked by the end of financing for presidios and for gifts to Native
Americans to maintain the peace. The Comanche and Apache were
successful in raiding for livestock and looting much of northern Mexico outside
the scattered cities. Northern Mexico was a violent and chaotic area due to the
Indian raids. The raids after 1821 resulted in the death of thousands of
Mexicans, halted most transportation and communications, and decimated the
ranching industry that was a mainstay of the northern economy. As a result, the
demoralized civilian population of northern Mexico put up little resistance to
the invading U.S. army.
No comments:
Post a Comment