why US lost WW3

USA: Giving to Russia a reward: "I am leaving the North of Africa", it is you to take it.

To be continued.

Why USA lost WW3.

Strategic move of USA that caused the most powerful army in the World lose the war: "Africa 2018".

Inexperience politician taking over the Presidency.

Turning the White House into a personal family business.

Politicians seen the party internal interest, not national needs.

The cost: Destruction of most of USA land.

20 million people dead, instantaneously.

40 million of Russians dead instantaneously.

All North and South Korea destroyed, millions of people dead.

Europe in economical Chaos.

England radioactive, main China taking control of all of the China sea.

The start of a New world.

Just go here and read, then come back to follow again.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/is-russia-hunting-defectors-in-america/ar-AAvjteE?ocid=spartandhp

{“It’s easy to find us, if they are really determined,” one defector in the U.S. tells Newsweek.  Phone calls and emails make it easy for Russian eavesdroppers to locate them. A visit from a relative back home makes it even easier. Agents can just trail them to a defector’s doorstep.

Some U.S. security sources say there has been an uptick in Russian activity here over the past two years. Suspected Russian agents have been spotted cruising the neighborhoods of some defectors protected by CIA security teams, they say.  The FBI and CIA have been” bringing people out of retirement, people who worked against the Russians in the 1990s,” to cope with the the challenge, the defector said, speaking anonymously out of fears for his personal safety.}

So, as could be seen, there were situations that triggered that atomic war; situations that could have been avoided by following the steps as did England: denounce and expel.  Even US expelled, but were forced to do so or else; the president on that time was been investigated by a special tribune which started questioning his advisers, campaign directors and anyone involved in his election; the president was left for last, untouchable meanwhile …that president had a mental problem not diagnosticated yet.

The causes of mental disorders are often unclear. Theories may incorporate findings from a range of fields. Mental disorders are usually defined by a combination of how a person behaves, feels, perceives, or thinks.^[4] This may be associated with particular regions or functions of the brain, often in a social context. A mental disorder is one aspect of mental health. Cultural and religious beliefs, as well as social norms, should be taken into account when making a diagnosis.^[6] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mental_disorder  

The president at the moment before the war, had behaviours not proper of any president in the history of the USA; take in consideration that a behaviour like the one presented by that president, if it were in a private institution, let’s say, a real estate, would be acceptable, for it is the real estate business man’s own money, not somebody else money.  The public has no “business” in watching how the real estate owner invest his economy. If the Real Estate man loses all, that’s his problem.  But the president on that time was not the owner of the White House, the Presidential Palace of the USA.  He was elected by the people to govern and protect the nation; not certain parts of it getting the most benefit and perjuring the rest ...as an example: there was one time when he mentioned to change the distribution of money for people needed to feed their family by taking away the money, and the fed government sending to them packages of food to nourish their family, the same as is done when a hurricane devastate a geographical region, and private as well as fed institutions distribute food to the affected population, not money, except to their government, with exceptions too, some times to people as well; but food and water as well as health care.  The military step in and help cleaning main avenues, re-establishing energy grids and creating emergency cabin for people to find shelter as their governors re-establish the town, city or state as needed with their own money and money given by the fed gov.

As you could see, the mentality of the president of that time was not well tuned with realities: time and space of the time.  It was a disparity away of how things are done.

That president insisted in creating or building a wall between the Nation State of Mexico and USA to block illegal immigration from the South of USA, where millions of people had emigrated from the miseries encountered in their country of origins; stopping the transit of illegal drugs and merchandises between both countries, as the USA furnish great quantities of guns, ammunition and other devices as cellphones directly to the mentioned Nation State of Mexico to be use by drug dealers.

First, he agitated against poor hard-working immigrants coming to this nation, illegally, as “criminals” and things like that.

One thing he did was promising his electors to make that nation pay for the building of that “wall”.

That president never imagined the cost of that wall, after he became president it was figured would cost over 25 billion of dollars.  Money not in the hands of the fed to spent.  He dreamed a wall could be build by him, never even consulted any of his advisers if such a statement could be hold long after; he kept insisting, far away from reality, that the other nation would pay for it; for he would force them to pay.  Just think on such a behaviour of that president on that time.  Was he a person with a healthy vision?  If a candidate makes such a promise, after winning the elections, he/she would figure out how to reverse the said before and offer something still much better (telling its offers had been upgraded to achieve a better stability on that chaos of illegal immigration to this nation, creating too many undocumented people that then were exposed to job abuses and humiliation by some employers.  Those undocumented people, couldn't be taken into consideration when social needs arises as in the creation of new schools, hospitals and other resources to serve the population, for, they were unknown to exists and they had to be counted for that purpose.   Us would penalize them, the undocumented ones, as well as give them legal stay in this nation either temporarily or permanently ...for, they already became part of the economy enriching the nation. Then with the money gained, would use it to build the wall.  That would be the best exist to his promised wall; but he kept insisting and insisting in fulfilling his promise as said before.  Of course, that promise had a link, he was a racist.

He, the president on that time, had a fixed idea: he would achieve things, solo.  Other presidents failed achieving things using dozens of counselors, advisers, governmental department spying on other nations and advising the president of nations’ weaknesses and strong economic health, politicians and business men.  He, this former president, started flipping the former president of Russia of that time …a man decided to regain all the territory Russia lost when it was a Socialist State; cause of the war that eliminated both nations in its totality …many European nations survived the attack, but they were handicap militarily and economically, would take years to achieve the state of living before the war; for there were few strong economies to make business with as of then.

This man, the US president, was a mental deranged person.

 derange

verb

1. To put out of proper order:

disarrange, disarray, disorder, disorganize, disrupt, disturb, jumble, mess up, mix up, muddle, tumble, unsettle, upset.

2. To disturb the health or physiological functioning of:

disorder, turn, unsettle, upset.

3. To make insane:

craze, madden, unbalance, unhinge.

The American Heritage® Roget's Thesaurus. Copyright © 2013, 2014 by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. All rights reserved.

From: the FreeDictionary by Farlex.

…was a person who would put inexperienced actors of the economic richest people, to direct any department of the fed gov. not caring for the consequences of mishandling the situation at work with trial and errors, a grave way of solving social-political and economic problems.

Just to mention a poor situation of what happened in other nation, a very small nation in the Caribbean, an island: the president of that nation, once appointed a chemist as director of all big water dams in the country… a cyclone entered the nation.  Zero measured were taken to prevent a major catastrophe; the existence of the Cyclone moving toward that nation was known weeks before.  It entered with very strong force and dozens of people died drawn when the biggest dams overflow with water about to break it, possible collapsing.  Meantime, the director or boss in controlling those dams was vacationing in Europe weeks before and during the mess: a chemist doing the work that correspond to a dam engineer who knows how a dam is built and control in case a cyclone beat it, so, saving the lives of people in the environment around it, if opening its relief gates, how much in relation to the raining water to fall and in consequence not leaving the dam almost empty, if it would affect the land below in front of it by eroding the surface soil, destroying the community and how fast before the raining water would fall just to synchronize water been drained and water falling as well as moving people living around the dam; not a job for a chemist.  Well, the president of USA, on that time, was doing the same thing was done in that island but appointing a lot of unqualified richest in managing fed agencies and criticizing agencies such as the FBI of that time that had extreme expert people doing various job to protect the nation.  That’s why this president was a “derange politician” of the kind as well as making decree not related to real situations, hurting a lot of people and favoring big business, such as car emission and other research institution given advise to investors, free advices so investors could know the best way on investing on business; leaving embassies around the world Ambassador-less by which the US nation could get guidance by its Ambassadors, of what to do to emit laws in controlling foreign investment, and a numberless of things, USA was left blind in foreign relation around the world.

First error: suggesting the military in existence at the North of Africa, fighting a lot of deranged terrorist, will be move off Africa …so, in consequence, giving vast territory for Russia to psychologically influence, control and exploit for its geopolitical expansion in that continent.  It caused that Russia gained a stronghold in that continent, which situation helped them to feel they were getting strong, stronger and could confront USA, Europe and anyone else; the Russians with that stronghold, together with part of North Africa under its influence, putting all of the South of Europe exposed to the interest of the former president of that time, to exploit getting the best out of it doing and expanding its Russian ideology of wishing to be a superpower again: a new strong and uncontrollable Russia Nation that could see at all of Europe from any angle and put it on its knee, religious dictator nations became a foot, a column in assisting Rusia, and gain its will: nuclear atomic bombs …the OTAN and NATO had to fight a wider war against Russia on that time, and many Southern European nations were undecided in confronting Russia.  Russia, then, started conquering all the former nations of the Soviet Era, the war started; US lost it. Russia too.  More than 60 million people died from both sides.

Millions of people lost their lives in the pacific, the war stopped by itself, there were no victors but desolation.  China became the baton of the South Pacific China Sea, and took over Korea then after, without a fight, both Korea needed food and medicine ...US could not provide. The world needed China's tech for its rebuild, Europe was tired and going trough social difficulties to feed its population, had to eye China for that, and that nation could have enough for its own, not for others.

To be continued, next: turning the White House into a personal family business.