‘Idiotic and dangerous’: Republicans running out of answers for Trump to...

Which entity can exercise article 14 section 3 of USA Constitution? THE USA MILITARIES...article 14 section 3 of the Constitution of the United State of America, of the English speaking (...and/or multilanguage speaking) of the Continental side of America, can execute and exercise this article in strict response to US Magna Carta (its Nation State Constitution) when needed, as needed, where needed. So be it.

TOP Business Leaders TURN AGAINST Trump

Which entity can exercise article 14 section 3 of USA Constitution? THE USA MILITARIES...article 14 section 3 of the Constitution of the United State of America, of the English speaking (...and/or multilanguage speaking) of the Continental side of America, can execute and exercise this article in strict response to US Magna Carta (its Nation State Constitution) when needed, as needed, where needed. So be it.

Trump SLAMMED by 20 Republican SENATORS in OVAL OFFICE: "YOU BETRAYED US!"

Which entity can exercise article 14 section 3 of USA Constitution? THE USA MILITARIES...article 14 section 3 of the Constitution of the United State of America, of the English speaking (...and/or multilanguage speaking) of the Continental side of America, can execute and exercise this article in strict response to US Magna Carta (its Nation State Constitution) when needed, as needed, where needed. So be it.

Trump stages BIZARRE EVENT to avoid GETTING BOOED

...article 14 section 3 of the Constitution of the United State of America, of the English speaking (...and/or multilanguage speaking) of the Continental side of America, can execute and exercise this article in strict response to US Magna Carta (its Nation State Constitution) when needed, as needed, where needed. So be it.

"Impeach Trump Again": John Bonifaz on Fighting Trump's Lawlessness, Cor...

Which entity can exercise article 14 section 3 of USA Constitution? THE USA MILITARIES...article 14 section 3 of the Constitution of the United State of America, of the English speaking (...and/or multilanguage speaking) of the Continental side of America, can execute and exercise this article in strict response to US Magna Carta (its Nation State Constitution) when needed, as needed, where needed. So be it.

Independent Agency CEO: 'DOGE has broken into our building.'

Which entity can exercise article 14 section 3 of USA Constitution? THE USA MILITARIES...article 14 section 3 of the Constitution of the United State of America, of the English speaking (...and/or multilanguage speaking) of the Continental side of America, can execute and exercise this article in strict response to US Magna Carta (its Nation State Constitution) when needed, as needed, where needed. So be it.

Lawrence: Elon Musk got caught lying, and Donald Trump made the lie bigger

Which entity can exercise article 14 section 3 of USA Constitution? THE USA MILITARIES...article 14 section 3 of the Constitution of the United State of America, of the English speaking (...and/or multilanguage speaking) of the Continental side of America, can execute and exercise this article in strict response to US Magna Carta (its Nation State Constitution) when needed, as needed, where needed. So be it.

ARTICLE 14 SECTION 3 of the US constitution

Which entity can exercise article 14 section 3 of USA Constitution? THE USA MILITARIES...article 14 section 3 of the Constitution of the United State of America, of the English speaking (...and/or multilanguage speaking) of the Continental side of America, can execute and exercise this article in strict response to US Magna Carta (its Nation State Constitution) when needed, as needed, where needed. So be it.

The Rachel Maddow Show 3/17/25 | 🅼🆂🅽🅱️🅲 Breaking News Trump Today March ...

...article 14 seccion 3 of the Constitution of the United State of America, of the English speaking (...and/or multilanguage speaking) of the Continental side of America, can execute and exercise this article in strict response to US Magna Carta (its Nation State Constitution) when needed, as needed, where needed. So be it.

Tariff

Hey people, get dip in more data about what a tariff is. "tariff" Also found in: Thesaurus, Medical, Legal, Financial, Acronyms, Encyclopedia, Wikipedia... tar·iff (tăr′ĭf) n... 1... a. A list or system of duties imposed by a government on imported or exported goods... b. A duty or duties so imposed... 2. A schedule of prices or fees... tr.v. tar·iffed, tar·iff·ing, tar·iffs... "To fix a duty or price on." Now that we know, here we go: ...When we place a tariff on imported things, the one who fabricated them has, and must increase the cost to fabricate the thing to be purchased by someone else, be it an institution (entity) or individual (s); think again: who purchases it? The final buyer or "user"... Can a fabricator put a tariff on the buyer too? No, it is the government to which the thing is going to be sold by the seller (fabricator). That is, many times, a small cost to the thing that is going to be consumed by the government (via a user or buyer) where it is going to be sold (to its people) ...of course, it is his/her product (the fabricator’s) that they are exporting to countries that impose taxes to the product (eventhough was not made by that government), not to the fabricator that already pay a duty (some fabricator do not pay a duty at all, based on international contracts), tariff (or tax) from government to government, (and the buyer pays for it when he/she buys it) ...if there is any intermidiaries, then they add on there benefits on the total of the percentage of the tariff and the tax on that item (its final cost). But if the product is marked with a price (cost of production + its benifits) from the fabricator to other second add-on fabricator, it is understandable that the cost of the product has to be increased-in, once it leaves the second fabricator add-on, or add-on by the receiver in order to export it to a second place even it would stay in the same territory where it is, or abroad but, this is not a tax to the second fabricator it is a cost add-on, in this case, the second fabricator, mostly, pay no taxes at all, it is the final user who is going to pay that tax including part of the tariff, all in one. So, now the product has the cost (s) of fabricating it, and the tariff if any imposed by the country that is going to receive it + the tax imposed by that country to the buyer. Any other tax the user has to pay if he/she is going to take it abroad in large quantities not for personal use, yet a certain amount is permitted to be taken abroad (in small quantities, this is called: exoneration) but in large quantity; this comes to be an illegal tax if it is that the fabricator (s) that is/are using that country as a temporary stop for its goods, on the reason that that is not its destination. If the fabricator receives a tariff for its product, that is illegal cuz it violates the free movements of merchadise. it is not its final destination and it cannot be distributed in that country, if so, then, it’s called: contraband if distributed …if the fabricator sells it to a buyer then, it has to inform the government where the merchandise is staying (temporary) and pay the apropiate taxes; in any way, if that government has a problem with the fabricator, under agreeing mutual laws (international laws), the government with the merchandise can possess the fabricator’s property (s), cases there are that their Ambassadors’ could get an agreement that could be accepted or not by their presidents, Ministers or the fabricator (s) can ask for help to its country’s authorities; it cannot imposes on it another tariff to the product they are going to export cuz the country to which it had been destined is at a tariff-economy war with them. Who is the one that pays full price of the thing? The buyer! If the buyer now the user, have to go through out all that labyrinth, the buyer will not buy the thing cuz its cost is too high and time would make it difficult. The above situation forces the buyer to never acquire the item or thing dearest needed: a car, clothes, things, movies, travel and the blah blah blah of situations. This is called inflation, abuses of penalties, manipulations or flagrant abuse. The fabricators do not create any longer those products, or are not exported to those countries. Those countries end up poorer and underdeveloped. Cuz the tech needed is not sold to them. That is a poor-poor business where there is no win-win businesses... Cuz of all the above and other things like it, whoever is in charge of international business, shall not be a lay person unless it is a well studied, or experienced, or graduated individual in the field he/she’s is going to deal in order not to crate any mess, a chaos or international conflict that hurt the nation, then it would have to be taken over by courts, presidents or ministers or known expertise’s in that area. https://youtu.be/FtiLjsZxvAU Updating will continue later, no time to continue as of now... Still confused? ...selling things made abroad in other countries is a win-win business cuz the government in which the sales is done, make money in taxes for things it did not make or fabricate. Also, the government where the thing was fabricated, make money too: both government make money. It is the user who pays the taxes. If the government that gets the taxes in form of revenue, mismanege this situation explaned above, that government loses the earn of the taxes that government implement and could not enrich its coffers to pay teachers, policeofficers, its militaries and the blah blah blan of things. Got it? Not yet? Sorry, in a country there are more of idiots people (stupids) than wise or smart ones. And that is why our presidents shall have smart advisers or else. Got it now? No? Not yet? ...so, enter into the 2025-2028 Dark ages of the 21st. Century ...I am back just to tell y'll this: 'the fabricator has to make more money of that than the seller does for, it was the sacrifice of the fabricator, its investment and its work that has to enrich them much more than the amount of money the region where the selling is made, they get money too but on taxes. Now, that "region that make money too" on taxes cannot say they are losing money cuz they did not make any investment; on the contrary, they are earning money on something they never invested. That is why it is call: a win-win business: you invest, I win too. A government is not losing money cuz it invested nothing, nada and is making money from the effort of someone else. Cuz if people around the planet want to invest in a region a lot of work, creation eventhough it is fabricated in other places, the invested money pay taxes making that region very rich if not super-rich. If those investors are scared, they stop doing business and that region turn in a poor region. Why then people invest in that region? Cuz its Magna Carta, its Constitution, its laws, give them security for they to exist and do or make business which in other regions is not secure, guarantee or protected. Am I much clear now? US got partners and they feel secure too. Let US compete, and protect ya'll. Good, I like it now.

Link to cartoon 2025-2028 dark age.

https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1AvuaM.img?w=800&h=435&q=60&m=2&f=jpg ...enjoy this people!

2025-2028, Dark or Golden ages? Repeating History? To do, experience, or produce again.

In a Democracy Improvising a new Governmental System. Mapping the below: Open mind: based on Democracy composed of five axions, in physics is a hypothetical Quantum mass but, here it is hypothetical composition of Universal Democracy: Free Enterprise Capitalism Socialism Communism Dictatorship. All those axions have specific definitions if linked together, on their own, it cannot exist for they are an aberration of human intelligence: The ability to …understand and use knowledge. In the United States of America, its people are submitting its type a governmental system to new types of doing business without consulting any advisers nor any individual from congress even violating its century old constitution “We the People.” …the above is mostly done, it is difficult to admit, by its President as of now …a man with lay instructions, knowledge or understanding of Constitutional mandates of our country. Appling self-tough business rules not apt to a nation but personal ownership of a business or industry. A “country-manner of ruling” differs from a business. In a Democracy, you own a business but a country, unless you are a dictator (dictators feel they own the country, as it used to be in feudal time and regions, in which the owner could own its land and users, unless they were close to the owner’s family (sons, daughters, mothers and fathers and other relatives). Be it known that feudalism was and is as of today social archaic develops regions, an archaic type of personal government just to preserve someone’s property or a king’s ownership of large territories that included in it, the feudal territories conquest by the king and its high ranking militaries that in most of the time had to use a form of slavery in order to keep those feudal regions. …as we all know, the king could follow advises or disregard them as his/her needs, “the majesty wish.” In its people, this is, the need of its people, all included, belong to themselves; in a governmental system of “all for one, one for all” things are distributed accordingly in a complex distribution: “Free enterprise” and ownership, Capitalism, the right to own and invest what a person earns via accepted acts of exchanges, Socialism, at which a very large population decide what is going to be done by their elected officials (authorities) in the distribution of worth; of course, those authorities with experience in any field and experimented people who are to in full knowledge of the people constitution and of the of a system that could be learnt through work, studies or who already acquired it through time, like a written map to follow; which department has which right is limited to its jurisdiction including the individual right of its inhabitants (call human rights) and depending on the elected one or if it is a non-elected individual, already trained to do the work, of course, based on his/her learnt education not cuz they are rich but cuz they have knowledge and are observed by, mostly, the congress and justices which rules are applicable for that individual to follow as in the militaries, teachers, political institutions or entities but learnt through time and so on using knowledge, new ideas acceptable as the constitution rule and the congress tell to be done: reasoning, logic, and whatever does not violate its people and its neighbours (geopolitics) in a win-win mutualism …of course, one might get more benefits than the other in accordance to their ownership of what is invested and its value of the investment and never abusing of the wins of the other but guarantying that the other wins too; that is working in peace. In business, the government does not intervene with too many rules but with basic ones to protect those that intergrade that private institution, which rules (laws), have been already studied, discuss and accepted as above indicated; follow institutions (observed by courts, group of people (unions, neighbours, associations and the likes) yet they create their own rules in order to continue existing and/or create money, not war, or, and injustices. In the case of “communism” in a democracy, people must and shall contribute or apport a portion of their income to support the nations in the case as of taxes of different types supporting local, states and federal government. Dictatorship: once laws were created, it is for each and every one to comply with it, without exception to the rule and as defined by the governments. All those axions must work interrelated, not one independent of the other at which they destroy the other. Congresses of the governments make the rules of governments, not opposing the survival of one while destroying the other. No individual can oppose them unless a court of justice and the individual discusses specific situations at which an individual, group or entity demonstrates the contrary and the rules (laws), are illegals en perjury of and etnia (in Roman language) or ethnic, a social group or individual. Here we go now: few people, who in my understanding of human civilization, are ignorant or ignore those rules or are part of them. If the above is applied to a system of Democracy, be them as dictatorship (making it to be obeyed) be it in a Democracy or any other type of government but the law of the people, it is a Democracy by association. Though it may cause, through time, revolutions, international tours (protests), internal massacres (vandalism), selected abuse (stealing), and the infiniteness of things ending up with the existence of a nation. Result? It might be positive as that of the French Revolution and many other revolutions yet the French one is the most notable of all of them cuz it gave origen to the Human Rights (not well followed by dictatorships (it encloses its self-destruction), called by many different names: Communism, Socialism, and some time form of governments that could be called: government of savages as that of the Cambodia in Asia sometimes ago. In the United States of the North of the Americas, the Inglish (take the money and run) speaking region (a country of a very rich and diverses languages), a new form of government is about to rise up, which yet has no proper defined name which as I call it: CapyCracy, a mix of the extreme capitalists and their rules (making a stress on the -y- of Capy, called in Spanish: an accent). See here that Democracy, lost the word “Demo” and Capy has subtitled the meaning of “We the people,” eradicated, killed, denigrated. The Constitution is not obeyed unless it is at their convenience; those that do not follow its rules, I call them: idiots, other people call them stupid’s. Why? Cuz, they do not read, follow, or obey the mandate of the Constitution of “We the People,” they guess it or interpret them as their likes and benefit out of it. The USA, had survive a couple of hundred of year cuz if followed the way it is written, our government will exist a few more hundreds of years but, and it is a but worth to mention: “but” I think that some closure could be added to it, the “We the people” in order to avoid the above (CapyCracy) to happen, ending with the Magna Carta that cost so many lives, sacrifices and elaboration to serve us as the good for this nation. Just add to it these requirements: To be a police officer, a requirement to have completed the full yrs of high school studies and know or understand the constitution of the country. To reach the grade of Lieutenant in the police force, must have to had done at least two years of college+ had been in the force at least 4 or more yrs. To reach a higher grade, to finish a full four yrs or higher. …and to become the chief of the police force, had finish those four yrs and carry a diploma or college certificate in any field of studies, mostly in Liberal Arts or Science, if possible, Associated in Arts. To be elected in the Congress of the USA, in the federal gov, must have an earned college degree in any field of four or more yrs. If the college degree is older than thirty yrs, the study of the Constitution is mandatory as a full course of study that had been done. Which entity can exercise article 14 section 3 of USA Constitution? THE USA MILITARIES...article 14 section 3 of the Constitution of the United State of America, of the English speaking (...and/or multilanguage speaking) of the Continental side of America, can execute and exercise this article in strict response to US Magna Carta (its Nation State Constitution) when needed, as needed, where needed. So be it.