Tariff

Hey people, get dip in more data about what a tariff is. "tariff" Also found in: Thesaurus, Medical, Legal, Financial, Acronyms, Encyclopedia, Wikipedia... tar·iff (tăr′ĭf) n... 1... a. A list or system of duties imposed by a government on imported or exported goods... b. A duty or duties so imposed... 2. A schedule of prices or fees... tr.v. tar·iffed, tar·iff·ing, tar·iffs... "To fix a duty or price on." Now that we know, here we go: ...When we place a tariff on imported things, the one who fabricated them has, and must increase the cost to fabricate the thing to be purchased by someone else, be it an institution (entity) or individual (s); think again: who purchases it? The final buyer or "user"... Can a fabricator put a tariff on the buyer too? No, it is the government to which the thing is going to be sold by the seller (fabricator). That is, many times, a small cost to the thing that is going to be consumed by the government (via a user or buyer) where it is going to be sold (to its people) ...of course, it is his/her product (the fabricator’s) that they are exporting to countries that impose taxes to the product (eventhough was not made by that government), not to the fabricator that already pay a duty (some fabricator do not pay a duty at all, based on international contracts), tariff (or tax) from government to government, (and the buyer pays for it when he/she buys it) ...if there is any intermidiaries, then they add on there benefits on the total of the percentage of the tariff and the tax on that item (its final cost). But if the product is marked with a price (cost of production + its benifits) from the fabricator to other second add-on fabricator, it is understandable that the cost of the product has to be increased-in, once it leaves the second fabricator add-on, or add-on by the receiver in order to export it to a second place even it would stay in the same territory where it is, or abroad but, this is not a tax to the second fabricator it is a cost add-on, in this case, the second fabricator, mostly, pay no taxes at all, it is the final user who is going to pay that tax including part of the tariff, all in one. So, now the product has the cost (s) of fabricating it, and the tariff if any imposed by the country that is going to receive it + the tax imposed by that country to the buyer. Any other tax the user has to pay if he/she is going to take it abroad in large quantities not for personal use, yet a certain amount is permitted to be taken abroad (in small quantities, this is called: exoneration) but in large quantity; this comes to be an illegal tax if it is that the fabricator (s) that is/are using that country as a temporary stop for its goods, on the reason that that is not its destination. If the fabricator receives a tariff for its product, that is illegal cuz it violates the free movements of merchadise. it is not its final destination and it cannot be distributed in that country, if so, then, it’s called: contraband if distributed …if the fabricator sells it to a buyer then, it has to inform the government where the merchandise is staying (temporary) and pay the apropiate taxes; in any way, if that government has a problem with the fabricator, under agreeing mutual laws (international laws), the government with the merchandise can possess the fabricator’s property (s), cases there are that their Ambassadors’ could get an agreement that could be accepted or not by their presidents, Ministers or the fabricator (s) can ask for help to its country’s authorities; it cannot imposes on it another tariff to the product they are going to export cuz the country to which it had been destined is at a tariff-economy war with them. Who is the one that pays full price of the thing? The buyer! If the buyer now the user, have to go through out all that labyrinth, the buyer will not buy the thing cuz its cost is too high and time would make it difficult. The above situation forces the buyer to never acquire the item or thing dearest needed: a car, clothes, things, movies, travel and the blah blah blah of situations. This is called inflation, abuses of penalties, manipulations or flagrant abuse. The fabricators do not create any longer those products, or are not exported to those countries. Those countries end up poorer and underdeveloped. Cuz the tech needed is not sold to them. That is a poor-poor business where there is no win-win businesses... Cuz of all the above and other things like it, whoever is in charge of international business, shall not be a lay person unless it is a well studied, or experienced, or graduated individual in the field he/she’s is going to deal in order not to crate any mess, a chaos or international conflict that hurt the nation, then it would have to be taken over by courts, presidents or ministers or known expertise’s in that area. https://youtu.be/FtiLjsZxvAU Updating will continue later, no time to continue as of now... Still confused? ...selling things made abroad in other countries is a win-win business cuz the government in which the sales is done, make money in taxes for things it did not make or fabricate. Also, the government where the thing was fabricated, make money too: both government make money. It is the user who pays the taxes. If the government that gets the taxes in form of revenue, mismanege this situation explaned above, that government loses the earn of the taxes that government implement and could not enrich its coffers to pay teachers, policeofficers, its militaries and the blah blah blan of things. Got it? Not yet? Sorry, in a country there are more of idiots people (stupids) than wise or smart ones. And that is why our presidents shall have smart advisers or else. Got it now? No? Not yet? ...so, enter into the 2025-2028 Dark ages of the 21st. Century ...I am back just to tell y'll this: 'the fabricator has to make more money of that than the seller does for, it was the sacrifice of the fabricator, its investment and its work that has to enrich them much more than the amount of money the region where the selling is made, they get money too but on taxes. Now, that "region that make money too" on taxes cannot say they are losing money cuz they did not make any investment; on the contrary, they are earning money on something they never invested. That is why it is call: a win-win business: you invest, I win too. A government is not losing money cuz it invested nothing, nada and is making money from the effort of someone else. Cuz if people around the planet want to invest in a region a lot of work, creation eventhough it is fabricated in other places, the invested money pay taxes making that region very rich if not super-rich. If those investors are scared, they stop doing business and that region turn in a poor region. Why then people invest in that region? Cuz its Magna Carta, its Constitution, its laws, give them security for they to exist and do or make business which in other regions is not secure, guarantee or protected. Am I much clear now? US got partners and they feel secure too. Let US compete, and protect ya'll. Good, I like it now.