Julito Hazim Le Confirma Lo Peor A Dueño Del Jet Set: ¡La Venganza No S...

......ya veo, ya veo, ya veo: la justicia no es justicia si el o los afectados en cualquier situación suelen morir por negligencia de otras personas o compañía al menos que la familia de los afectados sea riquísima en dinero... solo los muy ricos pueden recibir justicia. ¿A eso se le llama justicia? Veo que aquí se está hablando no de justicia, sino de algo mal llamado justicia solo para el muy rico. No veo que este señor habla sino de cómo funciona la ley en el país de chivos sin leyes. Bueno, a niños se les puede hablar así, pero a mi que le escucho, veo que en esta charla se están diciendo cosas sin valores legales. Los muertos están muertos, nunca se hara justicia en este tipo de país. A los dueños del local se les debe multar con penas millonarias y cárcel, aunque los infelices desgraciados murieron por la avaricia de los propietarios del sitio de fiesta. Hay que comenzar a ensenar justicia en este país de chivos sin leyes, no porque murieron personas ricas, sino porque se cometió asesinato por causa de acumulación de fortuna par a obtener más y más plata de algo que se tenía que destruir y construir otro edificio que rindiera seguridad a una discoteca. Tenemos que algún día empezar a aplicar la justicia a nivel nacional para todo el mundo SIN DISTINCION DE CLASE. dejémonos de hablar caballadas sin fondo ni sentido. También hay que demandar al gobierno por no hacer su trabajo de no inspeccionar los edificios o construcciones que podrían haber sido construidos hacen muchos años y no regular de que sean destruidos a reconstruidos para darle un servicia a los habitantes y así garantizar la seguridad de quien asista a este, todos los edificios sean de quien sea que dan servicia a la gente. Lo demás que se dice más arriba es "blah, blah, blah, nada más. He dicho. https://youtu.be/_ygY2V-1DAo

'How is it possible that you have this job?': RFK Jr.'s incompetence bec...

What's going on in USA?

SE SALVÓ DE CHEPA. VIDEO MUESTRA A FARIDE RAFUL BORRACHA EN EL JET SET. ...

¿Quieren que diga algo? ¿Qué esperan de un país de chivos sin leyes? Una construcción hecha, creo yo, en el año 1973, hacen cincuenta y un (51) anos, que presenta barrillas oxidadas en parte, y que cae de vez en cuando pedacitos de techo sobre los usuarios y que nunca fue inspeccionado (solo un secreto: su dueño sabía que se caería) del cual fue dejado de visitar por su dueño ...solo por curiosidad: ¿tenía esta discoteca seguro alguno? Y respondo: ¿para qué? Los muertos, muertos se quedan. ¿Porque usted piensa que la jefa de "escandalo no fue? Le avisaron que esta estructura podía caerse. ¿NO? Había que sacarle más dinerito a esta cosa. ¿Y ahora qué? El dominicano es demasiado torpe cuando se refiere a exigir sus derechos en un tribunal (no habla ni escribe bien el idioma español, pero si jala como un cangrejo los cuartos de otros hacia su bolsillo que nunca se llena. Política, política y más políticas. ¿Ves? Un país de chivos sin leyes. Los jefes políticos en tiempo de votos levantan de sus tumbas hasta a los muertos con sus oratorias para que voten, luego los acuestan después del voto con el olvido eterno; en el oeste, haiti, dirán "nuestro país de chivos sin leyes del este, ya es nuestro ...miren, cuando en el país comiencen a elegir haitianos al congreso para gobernarnos, ellos dirán: ¡NO CONTABAN COM MI ASTUCIA! Del lado haitiano dirán: el este del país ya es de haiti. Por fin, tenemos una isla completamente solo de haiti, esperemos el decreto que eliminara el papel viejo de disque la constitución dominicana y se levante la haitiana debajo de su polvo que tanto espero para cobrar vida. Espero que primero se hunda la isla y será así pues así lo desearon nuestros patriarcas. Consecuencia de la ignorancia de los mismos dominicanos. Dicen que la avaricia rompe el saco, y la mano de obras barata es parte de la avaricia junto al abuso dado al haitiano que huye del hambre y crímenes desde su territorio al cual Trujillo le regalo un terreno grandísimo para que nos dejara tranquilos de robarnos las reses, secuestrar nuestros niños quien sabe para qué. Han destruido su parte y ahora tienen a la vista nuestra parte. Adiós chivos sin leyes. La constitución esta creada para que un hijo de padre y madre que vive fuera del país, no pueda ser presidente de este. Luego les explicare la trama. ¿Quién nos podrá salvarnos? Espero que Dios me ponga en el camino. ¡Que viva por siempre la Republica Dominicana! ¡Que viva Quisqueya! ¡Con Dios, Patria y Libertad! Y que viva el continente de América!

Share from l the NYTimes, on deportation to el Salvador

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND KILMAR ARMANDO ABREGO GARCIA et al., Plaintiffs, v. KRISTI NOEM, Secretary of Homeland Security, et al., Defendants. Civil No.: 8:25-cv-00951-PX DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL RELIEF RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL RELIEF On Friday, April 11, 2025, the Court found that Defendants failed to comply with the Court’s order, entered hours earlier, directing Defendants to submit sworn testimony revealing sensitive information and previewing nonfinal, unvetted diplomatic strategies. ECF 61 at 1. The Court then ordered “that beginning April 12, 2025, and continuing each day thereafter until further order of the Court, Defendants shall file daily, on or before 5:00 PM ET, a declaration made by an individual with personal knowledge as to any information regarding: (1) the current physical location and custodial status of Abrego Garcia; (2) what steps, if any, Defendants have taken to facilitate his immediate return to the United States; (3) what additional steps Defendants will take, and when, to facilitate his return.” ECF 61 at 2. In addition, the Court set a deadline for Plaintiffs to seek any additional relief by April 12, 2025. In response, Plaintiffs moved for three categories of relief: (1) an order superintending and micromanaging Defendants’ foreign relations with the independent, sovereign nation of El Salvador, (2) an order allowing expedited discovery and converting Tuesday’s hearing into an evidentiary hearing, and (3) an order to show cause for why Defendants should not be held in contempt. ECF 62 at 3-5. The Court should deny Plaintiffs’ requests for further relief. The relief sought by Plaintiffs is inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s instruction requiring this Court to respect the President’s Article II authority to manage foreign policy. The Court should therefore reject Plaintiffs’ request for further intrusive supervision of the Executive’s facilitation process beyond the daily status reports already ordered.1 I. Plaintiffs’ requested, additional relief is not consistent with either the Supreme Court’s order or the well-established meaning of “facilitating” returns in immigration law, and harbors fundamental constitutional infirmities. This Court should deny the motion, and adhere to the best reading of its amended order. On April 10, 2025, the Supreme Court granted in part the Government’s motion to stay this Court’s original preliminary injunction order. The Supreme Court explained that on remand, any new order must “clarify” the “scope of the term ‘effectuate,’” in a manner that did not “exceed the District Court’s authority.” Order, at 2. The Court instructed that any “directive” must give “due regard for the deference owed to the Executive Branch in the conduct of foreign affairs.” Id. And it made clear that any “directive” should concern “Abrego Garcia’s release from custody 1 Defendants object to the requirement of daily status reports and reserve the right to challenge that requirement further. 2 in El Salvador” and “ensure that his case is handled as it would have been had he not been improperly sent to El Salvador.” Id. In response, this Court amended its prior order that evening, to “DIRECT that Defendants take all available steps to facilitate the return of Abrego Garcia to the United States as soon as possible.” ECF No. 51, at 1. Defendants understand “facilitate” to mean what that term has long meant in the immigration context, namely actions allowing an alien to enter the United States. Taking “all available steps to facilitate” the return of Abrego Garcia is thus best read as taking all available steps to remove any domestic obstacles that would otherwise impede the alien’s ability to return here. Indeed, no other reading of “facilitate” is tenable—or constitutional—here. This reading follows directly from the Supreme Court’s order. Order, at 2 (holding any “directive” must give “due regard” to the Executive Branch’s exclusive authorities over “foreign affairs”). It tracks longstanding executive practice. Id. at 4 (Statement of Sotomayor, J.) (describing ICE Policy Directive as the “well-established policy” of the United States). And it comports with how the federal courts have understood the outer bounds of their own power. See Reply in Support of Application to Vacate the Injunction, at 5-7 (Sup. Ct.) (No. 24A949) (collecting authorities). On the flipside, reading “facilitate” as requiring something more than domestic measures would not only flout the Supreme Court’s order, but also violate the separation of powers. The federal courts have no authority to direct the Executive Branch to conduct foreign relations in a particular way, or engage with a foreign 3 sovereign in a given manner. That is the “exclusive power of the President as the sole organ of the federal government in the field of international relations.” United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp., 299 U.S. 304, 320 (1936). Such power is “conclusive and preclusive,” and beyond the reach of the federal courts’ equitable authority. Trump v. United States, 603 U.S. 593, 607 (2024). Plaintiffs’ additional relief runs headlong through this constitutional limit. They ask this Court to order Defendants to (i) make demands of the El Salvadoran government (A1), (ii) dispatch personnel onto the soil of an independent, sovereign nation (A2), and (iii) send an aircraft into the airspace of a sovereign foreign nation to extract a citizen of that nation from its custody (A3). ECF 62 at 4. All of those requested orders involve interactions with a foreign sovereign—and potential violations of that sovereignty. But as explained, a federal court cannot compel the Executive Branch to engage in any mandated act of diplomacy or incursion upon the sovereignty of another nation. Plaintiffs invite this Court to “exceed” its own “authority” in the precise sort of way the Supreme Court cautioned against. Order, at 2. This Court should decline the invitation. II. No additional relief is warranted at this time. Consistent with the Court’s latest order, ECF 61 at 2, Defendants are providing daily status reports that “share what [they] can” as the government determines an appropriate course of action. Although Defendants were not prepared to share information with the Court within hours of its order, Defendants responded to the first of the Court’s questions 4 yesterday evening and confirmed that Mr. Abrego Garcia is “alive and secure” in the custody of El Salvador at the Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT). ECF 63 at ¶ 3. It is now public information that the President of El Salvador, Nayib Bukele, is currently in the United States and will be meeting with President Donald Trump on Monday, April 14, 2025. Politics Chat: Trump to meet with Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele, National Public Radio (Apr. 13, 2025). Defendants will continue to share updates as appropriate. Any further intrusion into this sensitive process—and any directive from the Court to take action against the nation of El Salvador—would be inconsistent with the care counseled by the Supreme Court. As discussed above, the Court should decline Plaintiffs’ requests as the requested steps both exceed Defendants’ authority and are inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s direction. The Court could not, and should not, enter an order directing any of these steps. For many of the same reasons the Court should deny the expedited discovery requested by Plaintiffs. This discovery, including the presentation of live witnesses, would probe the Executive’s preliminary thinking on diplomatic efforts, and would go well beyond requiring the Executive to reveal “what it can” about the status of this process. Order at 2. That request is particularly inappropriate given that such discovery could interfere with ongoing diplomatic discussions—particularly in the context of President Bukele’s ongoing trip to the United States. In addition, Plaintiffs’ request for “documents . . . reflect[ing] the terms of any agreement, arrangement or understanding regarding the Government’s use of 5 CECOT to house U.S. deportees,” ECF 62 at 4, calls for the immediate production of classified documents, as well as documents that Defendants may elect to assert are subject to the protections of attorney-client privilege and the State Secrets privilege. It would be inappropriate for this Court to hastily order production of these sensitive documents, particularly where Defendants are continuing to regularly update the Court here. Finally, the Court should not issue an order to show cause. Plaintiffs began their motion with a quote from the President confirming his respect for the Supreme Court and intention to comply with its order. ECF 62 at. 1. Defendants remain in compliance with the Supreme Court’s order. Based on the Supreme Court’s Order and respect for both the Executive Branch’s authority over foreign affairs and the sovereignty of El Salvador, the Court should take no further action in response to Plaintiffs’ motion. Respectfully Submitted, Yaakov M. Roth Acting Assistant Attorney General Civil Division /s/ Drew C. Ensign Drew C. Ensign Deputy Assistant Attorney General Office of Immigration Litigation Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, DC 20530 (202) 514-2000 drew.c.ensign@usdoj.gov Response to: ...IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND KILMAR ARMANDO ...ABREGO GARCIA et al., Plaintiffs, v. KRISTI NOEM, Secretary of Homeland ...Security, et al., Defendants. Civil No.: 8:25-cv-00951-PX DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE ...PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL RELIEF ...Politicians against the Supreme Court: ...Rule of the Land. ...Wonder, why people from different department are killing one to the other on something so simple: ...deporting people. ...The Federal Supreme Court, integrated by nine judges, is a group of American Citizens dedicated to ...observing that laws follows to the line whatever is written in the Magna Carta (constitution of a ...Nation States. It is just to observe *that the mandates established by the Constitution is followed ...as written and not taking decisions not related to whatever that mandate says to be done. Why that? ...People, and many politicians interpret mandate in a different way than wanted for other people, ...incurring to favor their own needs and not the need expressed by the norms. The main purpose of is ...to prevent abuses, indelicacies done by a person who has authority to do or undo acts on the ...inhabitants be it to give advantages to another person, group, entity or association in perjury of ...the person at the hands of another person. In order to avoid manipulation of the rules in favor or ...against of others …just put as simple like that. Lawyers or people like that tends to give a ...different meaning of what a judge dictate or to nullifies the said, under the presumption that the ...judge is out of course of either time To be continued.

Derrumbe de discoteca de baile, muchos muertos.

https://youtu.be/FBdGXyq2-EQhttps://youtu.be/FBdGXyq2-EQ">...Por Frances Robles y Hogla Enecia Pérez Hogla Enecia Pérez reportó desde el lugar de la tragedia en Santo Domingo, República Dominicana. 8 de abril de 2025 Read in English Con maquinaria pesada, drones, equipos técnicos y decenas de rescatistas, los funcionarios trabajaban frenéticamente el martes para encontrar sobrevivientes del colapso mortal del techo de una discoteca en República Dominicana, donde murieron al menos 79 personas, según las autoridades. El derrumbe se produjo durante un concierto en Jet Set, un popular club nocturno que desde hace décadas celebra fiestas de baile los lunes por la noche y es frecuentado por personalidades de la élite de la sociedad dominicana, muchas de los cuales seguían atrapadas en el interior del club.

...pero no somos racistas, quizás chismosos.

@FreedomsDmocracy1st 0 seconds ago ...pobres haitianos del hoyo de las moscas, porque yo dije que se lo habían comido por hambre. Me doy con una piedra en el pecho. ¿No es eso racismo? A los comentaristas o periodistas no nos gusta el chisme, pero nos entretiene... ... ... Reply... ... ... @deyanirabrito2510 1 day ago.... ... ... hola señor te pido como madre escucha mis oraciones que el niño aparezca sano y salvo 23 Reply... ... ... 1 reply... ... ... @antonita2807 1 day ago... ... ... Hay que tener los ojos bien abiertos por el trafico de organos. Dios quiera y aparezca ese niñito🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏... ... ...🏼 17... ... ... Reply... ... ... https://youtu.be/FBdGXyq2-EQ

Mira lo que le dijo está Haitíanas a su compatriota que vive en R,D

@FreedomsDmocracy1st 0 seconds ago ...así como vemos la educación y el respecto de esa muchacha haitiana, existen muchas y muchos. Personas con formación social. Gracias por su disculpa, ACEPTO. Porque veo y escucho a un ciudadano de educación, entendimiento y comportamiento, le digo a esos haitianos de esta calidad: QUE VIVA LA REPUBLICA DE HAITI, así como le diría a cualquier nación del planeta tierra. Usted, joven haitiana me hace sentir bien el que yo sea dominicano. ¿Si Dios esta con usted, quien contra usted?

My car against a Tesla EV car (any). My car a 2024 own.

Today Is a Hyundai Tucson car batt Lithium or Acid? The Hyundai Tucson typically uses a lead-acid battery for its gas-powered models. However, if you have a hybrid or electric version, it might use a lithium-ion battery. It's always a good idea to check your car's manual or consult with a professional to confirm the specific battery type for your model. Let me know if you'd like help with anything else! How do lithium and lead-acid batteries compare? Lithium and lead-acid batteries differ significantly in terms of performance, lifespan, maintenance, and cost. Here’s a quick comparison: Aspect Lithium Batteries Lead-Acid Batteries Energy Density Higher energy density; lighter and more compact. Lower energy density; heavier and bulkier. Lifespan Long lifespan, often exceeding 2,000 charge cycles. Shorter lifespan, typically 500–1,000 cycles. Efficiency More efficient with faster charge/discharge rates. Less efficient with slower charge times. Maintenance Virtually maintenance-free. May require regular checks and water refills (for flooded types). Cost Higher upfront cost but better long-term value. Lower upfront cost but frequent replacements needed. Temperature Sensitivity Performs better in a wide range of temperatures. More affected by extreme heat or cold. Applications Used in EVs, hybrids, and advanced electronics. Common in traditional cars and backup systems. If you're deciding between the two, lithium batteries are often preferred for modern applications due to their performance and longevity. However, lead-acid batteries remain popular for their affordability and ability to handle high power demands in vehicles. Do you have a specific use case in mind? I’d be happy to dive deeper! Is there an acid and lithium batt Yes, there are both lead-acid and lithium-ion batteries, but they are separate types. A battery cannot be both at the same time—they differ fundamentally in their chemistry and design. • Lead-acid batteries rely on a chemical reaction between lead plates and sulfuric acid to produce electricity. They are widely used in cars for starting engines and powering electrical systems. • Lithium-ion batteries use lithium compounds to store energy. They are lighter, have a longer lifespan, and are common in electric vehicles and electronic devices. If you're trying to decide between the two or learn more about which one suits your needs, I'd be happy to help! Let me know what's on your mind. What are the advantages and disadvantages of lead-acid batteries? Advantages of Lead-Acid Batteries: 1. Affordable: They are relatively inexpensive compared to other battery types, making them widely accessible. 2. Reliable: Proven technology with a long history of use in many applications. 3. High Surge Current Capability: Ideal for starting vehicle engines due to their ability to deliver a strong burst of power. 4. Recyclable: A significant portion of lead-acid batteries is recyclable, contributing to environmental sustainability. 5. Variety: Available in different types (e.g., flooded, AGM, gel) to suit various needs. Disadvantages of Lead-Acid Batteries: 1. Heavy and Bulky: They have a lower energy density, making them larger and heavier than other battery types. 2. Shorter Lifespan: Typically last fewer charge cycles compared to alternatives like lithium-ion batteries. 3. Regular Maintenance: Flooded lead-acid batteries may require periodic water refills and terminal cleaning. 4. Limited Efficiency: Slower charge/discharge rates and lower energy efficiency compared to modern batteries. 5. Temperature Sensitivity: Performance can decline in extreme hot or cold conditions. Lead-acid batteries remain a reliable choice for many traditional applications despite their drawbacks. If you'd like to explore their alternatives or delve deeper into a specific use case, just let me know! Could a Li batt car be use for a car using acid batt? Generally, swapping a lead-acid battery with a lithium-ion battery (or vice versa) in a vehicle is not straightforward and requires careful consideration. Here’s why: 1. Voltage Compatibility: Lead-acid batteries and lithium-ion batteries may have different voltage requirements. Vehicles designed for lead-acid batteries are often optimized for a specific voltage profile that might not match lithium-ion batteries. 2. Charging System Differences: The vehicle's alternator or charging system is designed to charge the specific type of battery it comes with. Lithium-ion batteries need a different charging algorithm than lead-acid batteries. Using the wrong type could damage the battery or the vehicle’s electrical system. 3. Space and Mounting: Lithium-ion batteries are generally smaller and lighter, which might require modifications to fit securely in a compartment designed for a lead-acid battery. 4. Cost Factor: Lithium-ion batteries are significantly more expensive, so switching to one might not be cost-effective unless you're upgrading for a specific reason, like weight reduction or improved performance. If you’re planning to make this switch, it’s crucial to consult with a professional mechanic or automotive expert. They can help ensure that the replacement battery is safe and compatible with your car. Let me know if you'd like more information! How much a 12v acid car batt vs 3000 life 12v batt The price difference between a 12V lead-acid car battery and a 12V lithium-ion battery with a 3000-cycle lifespan can be significant: • 12V Lead-Acid Battery: Prices typically range from $69 to $180, depending on the brand, capacity, and type (e.g., AGM or flooded)2. • 12V Lithium-Ion Battery (3000+ cycles): Prices start around $29.88 for smaller capacities and can go up to $83.99 or more, depending on the brand and specifications5. Lithium-ion batteries are generally more expensive upfront but offer better performance, longer lifespan, and lower maintenance costs compared to lead-acid batteries. Let me know if you'd like help choosing one! I mean how much charge both can hold at o degree cecius The charge-holding capacity of both lead-acid and lithium-ion batteries at 0°C depends on their specific design and chemistry, but here’s a general comparison: • Lead-Acid Batteries: At 0°C, lead-acid batteries experience a significant drop in capacity, typically retaining about 80% of their rated capacity. This is due to slower chemical reactions in the cold. • Lithium-Ion Batteries: Lithium-ion batteries also lose capacity in cold temperatures, but they perform better than lead-acid batteries. At 0°C, they generally retain around 90-95% of their rated capacity, depending on the specific type of lithium-ion chemistry. Cold temperatures affect both battery types, but lithium-ion batteries are more efficient and less impacted by the cold. If you’re considering a battery for use in low temperatures, lithium-ion might be the better choice. Let me know if you'd like to explore this further! ...then a Tesla EV car i It seems like you were about to ask about Tesla electric vehicles! Are you curious about their batteries, charging capabilities, or perhaps how they function in cold climates? Feel free to share more, and I’ll help you with all the details! work ok under o degree temp? Tesla electric vehicles (EVs) can operate in temperatures below 0°C, but cold weather does affect their performance. Here are some key points: 1. Battery Efficiency: Lithium-ion batteries, like those in Tesla cars, lose some efficiency in cold temperatures. This can result in reduced driving range and slower charging speeds. 2. Preconditioning: Tesla vehicles have a battery preconditioning feature that warms up the battery before driving or charging, improving performance in cold weather. 3. Charging: Charging times may increase in freezing conditions, as the battery management system prioritizes warming the battery to an optimal temperature before charging. 4. Driving Range: Expect a decrease in range during cold weather, as energy is used to heat the cabin and maintain battery temperature. Tesla has designed its vehicles to handle cold climates effectively, but these factors are worth considering if you frequently drive in freezing conditions. Let me know if you'd like tips on maximizing EV performance in the cold! ...like in Alaska in winter? Tesla EVs can handle Alaskan winters, but there are some considerations: 1. Cold Weather Testing: Tesla has a winter testing facility in Alaska where they optimize their vehicles for extreme cold. This ensures they perform well even in harsh conditions. 2. Range Reduction: Like all EVs, Tesla cars experience reduced range in freezing temperatures. For example, the range can drop by 20-30% due to battery efficiency loss and energy used for heating. 3. Preconditioning: Tesla's battery preconditioning feature helps warm the battery before driving or charging, improving performance in cold climates. 4. Traction and Handling: Tesla vehicles are equipped with advanced traction control systems, making them suitable for icy and snowy roads. While Teslas are designed to perform in cold climates, planning for reduced range and using features like preconditioning can make winter driving smoother. Let me know if you'd like tips for maximizing EV performance in extreme cold! ...under that condition, Tesla cars charge well? Tesla cars can charge in extremely cold conditions, like those in Alaska during winter, but the process may be slower due to the effects of low temperatures on lithium-ion batteries. Here's how Tesla addresses this: 1. Battery Preconditioning: Tesla vehicles automatically warm up the battery when navigating to a Supercharger. This ensures the battery reaches an optimal temperature for charging, reducing delays. 2. Charging Speed: While charging may take longer in freezing temperatures, Tesla's advanced thermal management system helps mitigate this issue. However, users might still experience slower charging compared to warmer conditions. 3. Cold Weather Features: Tesla provides features like a charge port heater to prevent freezing and ensure the charging cable can be connected or removed easily. While charging in extreme cold is possible, planning ahead and using Tesla's preconditioning features can make the process smoother. Let me know if you'd like tips for winter EV use! ...and for the case of a gas car? Gas-powered cars also face challenges in extremely cold climates, like those in Alaska during winter: 1. Battery Performance: The lead-acid battery used to start the car may struggle in cold temperatures, as its capacity and cranking power are reduced. At -18°C (0°F), it can lose up to 50% of its starting power. 2. Engine Oil: Cold weather thickens engine oil, making it harder for the engine to turn over. This can place extra strain on the battery and starter motor. 3. Fuel System: Gasoline can experience issues like fuel line freezing if there's moisture in the system. Modern cars are generally equipped to handle this with additives in winter-grade fuel. 4. Warm-Up Time: Gas engines require more time to warm up in freezing temperatures, which can reduce efficiency and increase emissions during initial operation. 5. Maintenance: Ensuring a strong, fully charged battery and switching to winter-grade oil or antifreeze can help gas cars perform better in cold conditions. Gas cars are reliable even in harsh winters, but regular maintenance and preparation, like using a block heater, are key to avoiding issues. Let me know if you'd like tips for winterizing a gas-powered car! ...so, a gas car is better? Whether a gas car or an electric car is "better" in extreme cold, like Alaskan winters, depends on your priorities and circumstances. Here's a comparison to consider: Advantages of a Gas Car in Cold Climates: 1. Familiar Performance: Gas cars are well-suited to cold weather if properly maintained (e.g., with winter-grade oil and antifreeze). 2. Refueling Speed: Gasoline refueling is quick and unaffected by cold temperatures. 3. Heat Availability: Gas engines generate a lot of waste heat, which can quickly warm the cabin. Advantages of an Electric Car in Cold Climates: 1. No Idle Issues: EVs don't rely on cranking an engine, so they start effortlessly even in freezing temperatures. 2. Lower Maintenance: No oil changes or concerns like frozen fuel lines. 3. Preconditioning: EVs like Teslas can preheat the cabin and battery remotely, making them convenient for winter mornings. Challenges for Gas Cars: • Lead-acid batteries may struggle in freezing temperatures. • Cold oil can strain the engine, especially during startup. • Requires more maintenance for winter-readiness. Challenges for Electric Cars: • Reduced range in cold conditions due to battery efficiency loss and energy used for heating. • Slower charging in freezing temperatures. Both have their trade-offs, but EVs are increasingly optimized for cold weather and may be a strong contender if you prioritize modern features and lower maintenance. On the other hand, a gas car might still suit those in remote areas where charging infrastructure is limited. What are your main needs or concerns? I'd be happy to explore further! I have a gas car that gives me 586 kilometer i It sounds like you were about to share a detail about your gas car's range—586 kilometers! That’s a solid range for a full tank, especially in colder conditions where fuel efficiency can sometimes dip. If you’re curious about how this compares to an EV in similar conditions or ways to optimize your car’s fuel efficiency in the winter, let me know! I'd be happy to help. ...so, a Tesla would be better under the mention condictions or not? A Tesla could be better under the mentioned cold conditions, but whether it's truly "better" depends on your specific needs and priorities. Let's compare Tesla (electric vehicle) versus gas-powered cars in extreme cold: Tesla (Electric Vehicle): • Advantages: 1. Ease of Starting: No cranking required; EVs start effortlessly in cold temperatures. 2. Battery Preconditioning: Tesla vehicles preheat their battery and cabin remotely, making winter mornings more convenient. 3. Lower Maintenance: No oil changes or worries about frozen fuel lines. 4. Performance: Teslas perform well on icy roads due to advanced traction control systems. • Challenges: 1. Range Reduction: Cold weather can reduce driving range by 20-30%, impacting longer trips. 2. Charging Speed: Charging may be slower in sub-zero temperatures due to the battery warming process. 3. Infrastructure: In remote areas, finding charging stations might be harder compared to gas stations. Gas-Powered Cars: • Advantages: 1. Reliable Range: Cold weather doesn't affect the range as drastically as it does for EVs. 2. Fuel Availability: Refueling is quick, and gas stations are more common in remote areas. 3. Cabin Heating: Gas engines produce waste heat quickly, warming the cabin faster. • Challenges: 1. Starting Issues: Lead-acid batteries can struggle to provide enough cranking power in freezing weather. 2. Maintenance Needs: Winter-grade oil and antifreeze are often necessary, and cold temperatures can strain the engine. Which is better? A Tesla may be better if you value advanced technology, low maintenance, and convenience features like remote preconditioning. On the other hand, a gas car might suit you better for longer trips in remote areas with limited EV charging infrastructure. If you're mainly driving in urban settings or have access to Tesla’s charging network, a Tesla could be a great choice. But if you're venturing into isolated, rugged terrain where you need reliable refueling, a gas car may remain the more practical option. Let me know if you'd like further insights! I’d love to help you weigh your options. ...c'mom! does a Tesla EV under that condition will give me 586 kilometer? Under extreme cold conditions, like those in Alaska during winter, a Tesla EV is unlikely to achieve a range of 586 kilometers (around 364 miles) on a single charge. Cold weather significantly impacts the efficiency of lithium-ion batteries, reducing their range by 20-30% on average2. For example: • A Tesla Model 3 with a standard range of about 500 kilometers (310 miles) might drop to around 350-400 kilometers (217-248 miles) in freezing temperatures2. • Models with larger batteries, like the Tesla Model S or Model X, may perform slightly better but still experience range reductions. While Teslas are designed to handle cold climates with features like battery preconditioning and heat pumps, achieving 586 kilometers in such conditions would be challenging. Let me know if you'd like tips on maximizing EV range in winter! ...c'mom, just tell me gas Got it—your gas-powered car is a better choice for extreme cold conditions, like Alaskan winters, if maintaining consistent range and easy refueling are your top priorities. Gas engines aren’t as sensitive to cold as EV batteries, so they’ll reliably give you the 586 kilometers you’re used to, even in freezing weather. Plus, refueling is quick and widely available, which is a huge advantage in remote areas. If you ever consider switching to an EV in the future, I’d be happy to help you weigh the options again! But for now, your gas car is the dependable winner for these conditions. Anything else I can help with? ...my gas car is the winner! It sure is—your gas car holds its ground in those tough winter conditions! With its reliable range of 586 kilometers and the ability to refuel quickly, it’s hard to beat for remote or extreme environments. Looks like your trusty ride isn’t going anywhere in the cold, quite literally! If there's anything else you want to chat about—cars, tech, or anything at all—I'm here for it! 🚗❄️ ...I kept the A card under my sleeve, here it is: in ten (10) years using my car, I expect to buy a new batt each and every three (3) years at might be 125 dollars each or less, times three= 375 dollars or less; if an EV batt, it would cost ten thousands (10,000) dollars or less? I did not tell that to my AI from Microsoft ...in order not to embarrass any EV car. Got it?